Ovarian Cancer and Us - best viewed in FIREFOX

Google Search: this blog, links from posts and the web.....

Loading...

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Women's Health - Full Text: Preventing familial breast and ovarian cancer: major research advances with little implication



Preventing familial breast and ovarian cancer: major research advances with little implication

Primary prevention of hereditary breast–ovarian cancer syndrome, which accounts for 5–10% of all breast cancer diagnosis, represents a prime paradigm of excellence of personalized medicine [1,2]. However, genetic testing can reveal that BRCA mutation carriers account for less than 25% of the familial risk. There has been little progress in explaining the missing heritability of the remaining 75% of women with family history who test negative for BRCA mutations. Neither recently identified common low-penetrance variants alone, nor their interactions with established environmental risk factors, are able to explain missing heritability. But even among BRCA mutation carriers, the decision by an expert scientific team for the optimal preventive strategy, choosing between prophylactic surgery and intensive surveillance, is very difficult and should be individualized for each woman. Here we discuss the latest advances in breast cancer genetics, their potential to impact prevention strategies and practices, and the future perspectives for a true personalized preventive medicine...........
Missing heritability
Previous sectionNext section
Previous work has suggested the polygenic model to help understand the 75% of breast cancer familial risk [6]. According to this model, the missing heritability could be explained by the accumulation of low to moderate genetic risk variants other than BRCA1/2 genes, namely BRCA3 or BRCA4 high-penetrance genes. Indeed, more than 15 years after the discovery of BRCA1/2 genes, the ‘classical’ linkage studies in high-risk families have identified no other high-penetrance genes. The completion of the HapMap 3 project with a database of common and rare variants [7] and high-throughput screening technology has allowed a new generation of association studies to provide improved understanding of the genetics of familial cancer.



Rare BRCA mutations
Next section

Missing heritability
Previous sectionNext section

Genome-wide association studies
Previous sectionNext section

Next generation of GWAS
Previous sectionNext section

Whole-genome & exome sequencing
Previous sectionNext section


Current practical preventive approaches
Previous sectionNext section

Conclusion
Previous sectionNext section

Editorial: Dynamic Tension Between Success in a Surgical Career and Personal Wellness: How Can We Succeed in a Stressful Environment and a ‘‘Culture of Bravado"?




full text.pdf Cancer Surgeons’ Distress and Well-being, I: The Tension Between a Culture of Productivity and the Need for Self-Care




(worth reading) Editorial: The Values and Value of Patient-Centered Care -- Epstein and Street 9 (2): 100 -- Annals of Family Medicine



"The originators of client-centered and patient-centered health care were well aware of the moral implications of their work, which was based on deep respect for patients as unique living beings, and the obligation to care for them on their terms. Thus, patients are known as persons in context of their own social worlds, listened to, informed, respected, and involved in their care—and their wishes are honored (but not mindlessly enacted) during their health care journey.26 There have been concerns that patient-centered care, with its focus on individual needs, might be at odds with an evidence-based approach, which tends to focus on populations. Fortunately, that debate has been laid to rest; proponents of evidence-based medicine now accept that a good outcome must be defined in terms of what is meaningful and valuable to the individual patient.7 Patient-centered care, as does evidence-based medicine, considers both the art of generalizations and the science of particulars.8"

Cochrane Review: abstract - Chemotherapy for malignant germ cell ovarian cancer [Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011] - PubMed result



AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
We found only low quality evidence on the use of chemotherapy in malignant germ cell tumours of the ovaries. Therefore we are unable to reach definite conclusions about the relative benefits and harms of chemotherapy use in this disease regardless of disease stage. Due to the benefit of chemotherapy in germ cell cancer of the testis, a trial of chemotherapy versus best supportive care is unlikely to be feasible. Despite this, good quality randomised studies are warranted in this disease to define the role of chemotherapy (type of chemotherapy, duration of treatment, benefit, short and long term toxicities). Given the rarity of this disease, we feel a trans-global approach would be essential in order to perform such trials.

alternate source including professional commentary (gynecologic oncology) link

full free access: (references Dr Folkman 1971) Antiangiogenic Therapies in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (printer-friendly)



Source: Posted: 03/22/2011; Cancer Control. 2011;18(1):31-43. © 2011 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc.

PLOS Medicine: Promotional Tone in Reviews of Menopausal Hormone Therapy After the Women's Health Initiative: An Analysis of Published Articles



View and Join Ongoing Discussions

0 responses Promotional Tones - Hormone Therapy after WHI

Posted by sandipniauskas on 23 Mar 2011 at 08:32 GMT
Most recent response on 23 Mar 2011 at 08:32 GMT
2 responses Pfizer Comment Posted by cloder on 17 Mar 2011 at 17:54 GMT
Most recent response on 22 Mar 2011 at 20:50 GMT
1 response Money isn't enough Posted by lexchin on 16 Mar 2011 at 16:55 GMT
Most recent response on 17 Mar 2011 at 14:27 GMT
0 responses Follow the money... Posted by EthicalNag on 16 Mar 2011 at 14:40 GMT
Most recent response on 16 Mar 2011 at 14:40 GMT