Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review



Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review


Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. Progression- free and overall survival is significantly related to surgical success and residual disease volume. It is unclear whether this survival advantage is due to an intrinsic biological element of the tumour cells which enables successful surgery and improved prognosis, or alternatively the number of tumour sustaining cells remaining irrespective of differences in biology. 
 METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed identifying studies that have investigated the association between biomarkers and surgical outcomes. We attempted validation of these results using The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian cancer data sets.
 RESULTS: Thirty studies were identified of which sixteen determined protein expression, eight gene expression and one DNA methylation in association with surgical debulking. Individualised linear models adjusting for batch, stage and age identified only expression of the genes MTDH and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGFIR) to be significantly associated with debulking surgery (P < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) < 5%), although in the case of IGFIR this was in the opposite direction to previous findings. 
CONCLUSION: The majority of studies are limited by design, include heterogeneous samples and lack adjustment for major confounding factors. High quality detailed clinical annotations should be routinely collected in future to more accurately evaluate biomarkers of surgical outcome. 
British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1069-1074. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.376 www.bjcancer.com Published online 30 August 2012 (c) 2012 Cancer Research UK

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.