Is the Two-Tier Ovarian Serous Carcinoma Grading System Potentially Useful in Stratifying Uterine Serous Carcinoma? A Large Multi-Institutional Analysis Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Is the Two-Tier Ovarian Serous Carcinoma Grading System Potentially Useful in Stratifying Uterine Serous Carcinoma? A Large Multi-Institutional Analysis



abstract

Highlights

140 patients with uterine serous carcinoma from three academic institutions were studied.
All cases were graded using MDACC two-tier grading system as low grade and high grade
The prognostic utility of application of MDACC two-tier grading system to uterine serous carcinoma is not applicable

Objective

A subset of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) may have better clinical behavior bringing up the possibility that there may be morphologic features, which would help in their categorization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential use of the MD Anderson Cancer Center 2-tier grading system for ovarian carcinoma in USC.

Conclusion

The presence of atypia and mitosis across a uterine serous carcinoma is notoriously variable in magnitude and extent, potentially making evaluation of these features difficult and subsequent grading subjective. Our findings thus show that actual prognostic utility of application of MDACC two-tier grading system to uterine serous carcinoma may not be applicable
 

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.