|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open access
Special Issue
Why does obesity promote cancer? Epidemiology, biology, and open questions
Keywords: obesity, body mass index, insulin, inflammation, DNA damage
Abstract
The association between obesity and/or metabolic syndrome and an
elevated mortality from cancer has been confirmed by an astonishing
number of studies across nations and ethnicities, such that obesity is
now recognised to be among the most prominent cancer risk factors
worldwide.
Despite this overwhelming evidence and the societal impact of obesity,
we know surprisingly little about the underlying molecular mechanisms.
This knowledge gap is a major obstacle to the implementation of
effective lifestyle change policies. As the scientific community is
insecure on what messages it should deliver, administrators are
uncertain as to what exactly to recommend, and consumers are confused
about whom to believe. This leaves the field flooded with
pseudo-scientific recommendations that are hard to eradicate.....
Gynaecological cancers (note: nothing on ovarian cancer)
Conclusion
The discourse on obesity and cancer has become dominant in public
debate. Some aspects of this issue are clearly established beyond any
reasonable doubt, namely the impact of obesity prior to diagnosis on
specific cancer risks and on survivor outcome. Other aspects, such as
the exact molecular mechanisms and the extent to which lifestyle changes
can modify risk, still await definitive proof. Ultimately, the debate
revolves on how much we can modify our cancer risk by intervening on the
most basic of animal activities: nutrition. Some might find it tempting
to dismiss this debate on the grounds that cancer risk (especially for
those cancers where a single environmental factor cannot be identified)
is mostly determined by ‘bad luck’, an un-escapable randomness in our
stem cells’ DNA mutation accumulation rate [52].
It is clearly not so, but it is also true that our understanding of how
nutrition impacts on cancer is far from complete. This creates fertile
ground for the proliferation of pseudo-scientific recommendations and
bogus ‘super healthy’ nutritional supplements. Likely, some mechanisms
and specific lifestyle interventions may have stronger impact on
specific cancers. It is also likely that an individual’s genetic makeup
may influence response to diet, as we find variable genetic
predisposition to specific cancers and genetically determined
differences in metabolism. In the wave of medicine personalisation, it
is not hard to imagine a future in which lifestyle plans will be
tailored to individual risk profile and metabolism.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.