|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open access
....All these results have therefore established the study of non-angiogenic tumors as a new field in cancer biology, but so far
we have only just scratched the surface. So what now are the most pressing questions we face?
One is: what is the biology underlying the non-angiogenic phenotype, and what are the mechanisms that allow a cancer cell
to switch between angiogenic and non-angiogenic phenotypes?
Second, how do the cancer cells interact with and co-opt the pre-existing vessels? Data published so far suggests that this
is an active process (26,29). Moreover, how does this process change in different organs?
Third, does vessel co-option also facilitate resistance to other classes of anti-angiogenic drugs, such as the VEGF-neutralizing
antibody bevacizumab?
Fourth, given that vessel co-option occurs
in many human cancers, including some of the most prevalent (eg,
malignancies from
breast, colon, rectum, and lung), is vessel co-option
also a mechanism of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in humans
and not just in animal models?
Last, but not least, can vessel co-option be
inhibited with drugs? The data of Kuczynski and colleagues shows that
the response
to sorafenib in HCC might be more durable if sorafenib
were to be combined with a drug that targets vessel co-option. However,
there are currently no drugs designed to target vessel
co-option in humans. In our opinion, this represents a major deficiency
in the current portfolio of oncology drugs and needs
to be addressed urgently.
Hopefully, this new field of cancer biology
will lead to novel therapeutic interventions designed according to the
relationship
observed between neoplastic cells and vessels in tumor
lesions, in the knowledge that tumors can also grow without inducing
angiogenesis.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.