Perspective
- Free Full Text
- Comments
- Free Full Text
- Audio Interview
- Comments
"Caring and compassion were once often the only “treatment” available to clinicians. Over time, advances in medical science have provided new options that, although often improving outcomes, have inadvertently distanced physicians from their patients. The result is a health care environment in which patients and their families are often excluded from important discussions and left feeling in the dark about how their problems are being managed and how to navigate the overwhelming array of diagnostic and treatment options available to them..........If we can view the health care experience through the patient's eyes, we will become more responsive to patients' needs and, thereby, better clinicians. Recognition of shared decision making as the pinnacle of patient-centered care is overdue. We will have succeeded in building a truly patient-centered health care system when an informed woman can decide whether to have a screening mammogram and an informed man can consider whether to have a screening prostate-specific–antigen test without their clinicians labeling the decision “wrong” on the basis of different values and preferences.Nothing about me without me.— Valerie Billingham, Through the Patient's Eyes, Salzburg Seminar Session 356, 1998
This study assessed toxicity in advanced cancer patients treated in a phase I clinic that focuses on targeted agents.
Patients and methods:An analysis of database records of 1181 consecutive patients with advanced cancer who were treated in the phase I program starting 1 January 2006 was carried out.
Results:All patients were treated on at least 1 of the 82 phase I clinical trials. Overall, 56 trials (68.3%) had only targeted agents, 13 (15.9%) only cytotoxics, and 13 (15.9%) targeted and cytotoxic agents. Rates of grade 3 and 4 toxicity that were at least possibly drug related were 7.1% and 3.2%, respectively, and 5 of the 1181 patients (0.4%) died from toxicity that was at least possibly drug related. The most common grade 3 or more toxic effects were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, dehydration, infection, altered mental status, bleeding, vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status greater than zero and use of a cytotoxic agent were selected as independent factors associated with serious toxicity.
Conclusion:Phase I trials of primarily targeted agents showed low rates of toxicity, with 10.3% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicity and a 0.4% rate of death, at least possibly drug related.
| Document Type: | Grants Notice |
| Funding Opportunity Number: | W81XWH-12-OCRP-OCA |
| Opportunity Category: | Discretionary |
| Posted Date: | Feb 27, 2012 |
| Creation Date: | Feb 27, 2012 |
| Original Closing Date for Applications: | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Current Closing Date for Applications: | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Archive Date: | Aug 17, 2012 |
| Funding Instrument Type: | Cooperative Agreement Grant |
| Category of Funding Activity: | Science and Technology and other Research and Development |
| Category Explanation: | |
| Expected Number of Awards: | 2 |
| Estimated Total Program Funding: | $2,400,000 |
| Award Ceiling: | |
| Award Floor: | |
| CFDA Number(s): | 12.420 -- Military Medical Research and Development |
| Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement: | No |
Eligible Applicants
Agency Name
Description
Link to Full Announcement
The POWER Study (Project for an Ontario Women's Health Evidence-based Report) Social Determinants of Health and Populations at Risk chapter is now available for download. Using a community-engaged research model and integrated KT approach, the POWER Study has examined a comprehensive set of evidence-based indicators bridging population health and health system performance. The Women's Health Equity Report is serving as an evidence-based tool for policy makers, providers and consumers in their efforts to improve health and reduce health inequities in Ontario. POWER has examined gender differences in access to care, as well as quality and outcomes of care for the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the province and how they differ by gender, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and geography. The Social Determinants of Health and Populations at Risk chapter examines the social determinants of health among Ontario's women and men including: low income, low education, indicators of employment, lone-parent families, and food insecurity. We also summarize the POWER Study indicators across all chapters as they relate to low-income populations, providing a synthesis of health functional status, risk factors and prevention, access to health care services, clinical management, and health outcomes of lower-income adults. The final section re-examines and synthesizes the POWER Study findings in relation to immigrant and minority populations, as well as reporting three indicators of immigrant women's health that have not previously been reported in the POWER Study. Based on our analyses, identified opportunities to improve health and health care and reduce inequities, together with broad community consultation and dialogue, we developed the POWER Health Equity Road Map. The aim of the Road Map is to help move us forward to the goal of achieving health equity in Ontario. The time to move forward is now. What is needed is the will and commitment. To download a copy of the full chapter or the highlights document (which outlines the chapter's key findings and messages): http://powerstudy.ca/the-power-report/the-power-report-volume-2/social-determinants-of-health-and-populations-at-risk The French translation of the Social Determinants of Health and Populations at Risk Highlights document will be available on our website soon. Also available for download from www.powerstudy.ca: Introduction to the POWER Study (Ch 1); The POWER Study Framework (Ch 2); Burden of Illness (Ch 3); Cancer (Ch 4); Depression (Ch 5), Cardiovascular Disease (Ch 6), Access to Health Care Services (Ch 7), Musculoskeletal Conditions (Ch 8), Diabetes (Ch 9), Reproductive and Gynaecological Health (Ch 10), HIV Infection (Ch 11), Older Women's Health Report. The POWER Study's concluding chapter 'Achieving Health Equity in Ontario: Opportunities for Intervention and Improvement' is forthcoming and will be available on our website soon. Arlene S. Bierman, MD, MS Echo's Ontario Women's Health Council Chair in Women's Health Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto and Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital 30 Bond Street (209 Victoria Street, Room 219) Toronto, ON M5B 1W8 Phone: (416) 864-3041 Fax: (416) 864-5641 Web: www.powerstudy.ca The POWER Study is funded by Echo: Improving Women's Health in Ontario, an agency of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. This report does not necessarily reflect the views of Echo or the Ministry. _______________________________________________
| Sponsor: | Catholic University of the Sacred Heart |
|---|---|
| Information provided by (Responsible Party): | Prof. Giovanni Scambia, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01539785 |
| Sponsor: | Gynecologic Oncology Group |
|---|---|
| Collaborator: | National Cancer Institute (NCI) |
| Information provided by: | National Cancer Institute (NCI) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01540565 |
Past studies of the human intestinal microbiota are potentially confounded by the common practice of using bowel-cleansing preparations. We examined if colonic lavage changes the natural state of enteric mucosal-adherent microbes in healthy human subjects.
Standard bowel cleansing preparation altered the mucosal-adherent microbiota in all of our subjects, although the degree of change was variable. These findings underscore the importance of considering the confounding effects of bowel preparation when designing experiments exploring the gut microbiota.
"We recommend that future investigations of the human enteric microbiota include un-prepped subjects in whom the natural state of the colonic microbiota can be preserved and observed. Acquisition of left sided colon samples should not be a major problem, but obtaining right side colonic samples will be more technically demanding; potentially requiring conscious sedation and increasing risk and duration of colonoscopic procedures. Nonetheless, in the hands of an experienced endoscopist, full colonoscopy in un-prepped individuals is feasible. Our group has an 80% success rate reaching the cecum in un-prepped patients.
In summary, we report that the routine practice of colonic lavage may significantly alter the mucosa-associated microbiota of the distal human colon. While the effects are obvious in some individuals, the effects of colonic lavage can be unpredictable. Given that colonic lavage has the potential to distort the enteric microbiota, we recommend that future studies of the human enteric microbiota be performed on the un-prepped colon where the natural state of both luminal and mucosa-associated microbiota is most likely to be retained.
| Noun: |
|
On Monday, February 27, 2012, TRIUMF/AAPS released a report surveying the utilization of PET imaging technolgoy for clincial care of cancer across Canada.
|
Pageviews last month
|
(Feb 2012) - 12,282
Pageviews all time history - 155,308
|
Pageviews by Browsers
|
| Noun: |
|
The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production. |