"The background to the adoption of the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) in the United States has important lessons
for Canada, especially in view of the increasing tread toward privatized
services within the Canadian public health care system. When the US
legislation was finally adopted in May 2008, observers rejoiced that
“[a]t last, the United States has a federal law that protects consumers
from discrimination by health insurers and employers on the basis of
genetic information.”1
GINA is the culmination of a long process that began in 1995 when
federal lawmakers first introduced the legislation. In the interim, more
than 45 American states had passed their own genetic nondiscrimination
laws.2
Such a high level of legislative activity indicates a deep and
abiding public concern about the issue of genetic discrimination. Yet
the same level of angst has yet to make its way north. Although a recent
Canadian study reports on perceptions of genetic discrimination with
regard to people at risk for Huntington’s disease,3
discussion of the general issue in Canada has been limited and is
focused primarily on discrimination in the context of life insurance.4
More significantly, there is no legislation comparable to GINA at
either the federal or the provincial/territorial level in Canada. Does
the absence of such legislation mean that Canadians are at higher risk
of genetic discrimination than Americans? Does Canada require similar
legislation?"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.