1):
Correspondence (Vodermark):
"In their recent contribution to Journal of Clinical Oncology, Brace et al1 report on the knowledge and opinions of physicians caring for patients with cancer in the province of Ontario, Canada, about
patient decision aids......Brace et al1
must be congratulated for collecting this comprehensive data set on the
oncologists' perspective on this important topic.
However, it is possible that the rates of decision
aid use by patients may actually be higher than suggested by the
percentages
for physicians responding to the questionnaire.
Access to disease-specific patient decision aids is provided freely on
the
Internet, and patients may make use of these tools
without discussing them with their treating oncologists..."cont'd
2):
Response to Vodermark (Erin D. Kennedy):
We appreciate the comments by Vordermark1 about our recent contribution to Journal of Clinical Oncology.2
"...We agree that the Internet certainly has the potential to be an excellent and accessible information resource for both patients
and physicians. The results presented by Vordermark et al3 and Adler et al4
are both interesting and timely, given that these data suggest that
patients seeking information on the Internet are not
comfortable discussing the information with their
physicians. This is similar to our own group's experience in which
patients
seem to be increasingly more confident in the
information they find on the Internet rather than in their own
physicians. This
is somewhat concerning, and we must begin to question
whether we as physicians are slowly losing the ability to connect with
our patients.......To accomplish this, researchers need to involve (not avoid)
physicians in both the development and implementation of pDAs and decision support tools.
"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.