Abstract:
"Oncologists are asked with increasing frequency to counsel their
patients with respect to the medical, psychological and social
repercussions of genetic testing for cancer
susceptibility that may have been prescribed by physicians or carried
out through
direct-to-consumer tests. This article critically
reviews the main ethical and social implications of BRCA testing,
focusing
on genetic responsibility and genetic
discrimination. Genetic responsibility toward oneself and others is a
highly debated
implication of genetic testing for cancer
predisposition that requires broad considerations of the boundaries
between individual
and community rights and a reappraisal of the
notion of autonomy as relational. Physicians’ duty to warn ‘at risk’
relatives
can be an ethical quandary, yet confidentiality is
key to the patient–doctor relationship. Mutation carriers may be subject
to different forms and degrees of genetic
discrimination and many individuals at risk have forgone BRCA testing to
avoid potential
discrimination. The scientific and medical
community, together with patients and the public, has actively engaged
against
genetic discrimination. The legislation in many
countries now protects against genetic discrimination by insurance
companies
and employers. Legal and regulatory issues are not
the final answer to discrimination and profound cultural changes are
required
to create understanding and acceptance of all
differences...."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.