Thursday, May 17, 2007
Saturday, May 12, 2007
Int J Gynecol Cancer (Article Abstract)
Blackwell Synergy - Int J Gynecol Cancer, Volume 17 Issue 3 Page 557 - May/June 2007 (Article Abstract): "International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Professionals’ and patients’ views of routine follow-up: a questionnaire survey
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 17 (3), 557–560.
doi:10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00839.x
* F.M. KEW**Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, EnglandFiona M. Kew, MB, ChB, MRCOG, Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sheriff Hill, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear NE9 6SX, England. Email: fiona.kew@ghnt.nhs.uk,
* K. GALAAL**Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, England,
* H. MANDERVILLE**Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, England &
* L. VERLEYE**Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, England
*Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, England
Abstract
Traditionally, women who have been treated for a gynecological cancer have undergone long-term follow-up by hospital doctors. Recently, there has been interest in alternative models of follow-up, including nurse-based review. The project compares patients’ and professionals’ views of follow-up. A questionnaire was completed by 96 women attending routine follow-up clinics and by 32 professionals involved in delivering follow-up. A large majority of women (82/96, 92%) and professionals (25/34, 73%) thought that follow-up should be provided by a hospital doctor. However, professionals were more likely to think that specialist nurses and general practitioners should be involved in the provision of follow-up (P < 0.01). Professionals thought that the most important part of the follow-up visit was the consultation, whereas women thought it was the examination (P < 0.001). Women thought that detection of recurrence was the most important reason for continuing surveillance, whereas professionals regarded addressing patients’ concerns as the primary reason for follow-up (P < 0.001). We conclude that the views of women undergoing follow-up after gynecological cancer differ significantly from the professionals providing follow-up care. These views must be considered when developing alternative follow-up strategies.
2007 UK abstract: The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: finding from a modified nominal group study
Entrez PubMed
Br J Cancer. 2007 Mar 26;96(6):875-81. Epub 2007 Mar 6.Click here to read Links
The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: findings from a modified nominal group study.
* Corner J,
* Wright D,
* Hopkinson J,
* Gunaratnam Y,
* McDonald JW,
* Foster C.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Members of the public are increasingly consulted over health care and research priorities. Patient involvement in determining cancer research priorities, however, has remained underdeveloped. This paper presents the findings of the first consultation to be conducted with UK cancer patients concerning research priorities. The study adopted a participatory approach using a collaborative model that sought joint ownership of the study with people affected by cancer. An exploratory, qualitative approach was used. Consultation groups were the main method, combining focus group and nominal group techniques. Seventeen groups were held with a total of 105 patients broadly representative of the UK cancer population. Fifteen areas for research were identified. Top priority areas included the impact cancer has on life, how to live with cancer and related support issues; risk factors and causes of cancer; early detection and prevention. Although biological and treatment related aspects of science were identified as important, patients rated the management of practical, social and emotional issues as a higher priority. There is a mismatch between the research priorities identified by participants and the current UK research portfolio. Current research activity should be broadened to reflect the priorities of people affected by the disease.
PMID: 17342090 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Saturday, May 05, 2007
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Thursday, April 19, 2007
April 19th, 2007 - message from New York reported event Friday April 20th - 10-12:30 pm Central Park at West 67th St, NY
I'm a reporter at New York Magazine, and we're organizing a big photo shoot
in Central Park TOMORROW.
I'm hoping that you could post it on your blog, and maybe even attend the
shoot yourself, if you live in the NY area! We're really working hard to
find just another 40 people to
come, and time is running out!
All the best,
Katie Charles
212 508 0668
New York Magazine Cover Shoot
New York Magazine is currently working on a very important feature story
about New Yorkers living with cancer. For a potential cover, we would like
to gather 300-350 New Yorkers living with cancer or in remission, in one
place, for an incredibly positive & moving picture. We are looking for
people of all ages, and of all races to to be photographed together.
We want to show the unity of the fight, so we are asking everyone to dress
on their own, as they normally would- no organization specific t-shirts. We
want the picture to look like a beautiful group of wildflowers. We hope this
will help raise awareness & funding for all.
Any interested participants should contact me directly at
alex_pollack@newyorkmag.com.
Logistical info below:
FINAL CALL SHEET/NEW YORKERS LIVING WITH CANCER
Date: Friday April 20th, 2007
Time: 10AM-12:30PM
Check-In Location: Tavern on the Green, Central Park at West
67th Street
Phone: 212.873.3200
New York Magazine contacts: Katie Charles 202.368.1836; Alex Pollack
917.538.1054
*Map attached
**IMPORTANT: Please arrive on time, as we have a very narrow window for the
permit from the Parks Department.
Let¹s try to have some color even though spring is late. Please dress in the
brightest color coat that you have- we don¹t want everyone in black or navy
coats, or the picture will look dreary. Please bring minimal bags/stuff with
you so we don¹t add unnecessary clutter to the photo. You will be asked to
fill out the attached 2 page form at the check-in table at Tavern on the
Green. To expedite the check-in process, if you are able to fill out the
form, print it & bring it with you, it would be very helpful. We will be
making individual portraits of each of you prior to the group shot.
IN CASE OF RAIN:
We have set up a rain date, should the weather not cooperate on Thursday
night/Friday. We have also set up a rain hotline. For updated information on
Friday morning, please call 212.508.0551.
Rain Date: Sunday April 22, 2007
Time: 11AM
Location: Pier 59 Studios, 59 Chelsea Piers
(btwn. 17th & 18th Streets on the water), Studio C
http://www.pier59studios.com/home.html
Phone: 212.691.5959
We¹re very excited to meet you all and to collaborate on this beautiful and
inspiring image.
Sincerely,
Katie Charles and Alex Pollack
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Friday, April 13, 2007
Monday, April 09, 2007
Wednesday, April 04, 2007
April 2007: Gynecologic Oncology : A cost–effectiveness analysis of chemotherapy for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian
Conclusions.
Second-line chemotherapy is cost-effective for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC. Due to minimal improvements in overall survival, third- and fourth-line chemotherapy are not cost-effective strategies.
ScienceDirect - Gynecologic Oncology : A cost–effectiveness analysis of chemotherapy for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
