Director of the Centre for Health-Related Research at
The importance of The Cochrane Collaboration.
Tony Jewell, Chief Medical Officer, Welsh Assembly Government
Sense about science
Tracey Brown, Managing Director, Sense About Science
Hunting for snarks: The challenge of getting evidence into guidelines
Fergus Macbeth, Director of the Centre for Clinical Practice, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
Chair: Julian Higgins
Co-Editor, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Addressing reporting bias
Jonathan Sterne, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol
Co-Convenor, Bias Methods Group
The risk of bias tool
Doug Altman, Director, Centre for Statistics in Medicine; Co-Convenor, Bias Methods Group
Summary of findings tables
Phil Wiffen, Operations and Training Director, UK Cochrane Centre
Including non-randomized studies
Barney Reeves, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol; Co-Convenor, Non-randomised Studies Methods Group
Incorporating economics
Miranda Mugford, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia; Chair of Convenors, Campbell and Cochrane Economics Methods Group
The role of qualitative evidence
Jane Noyes, Noreen Edwards Chair in Nursing Research; Director of the Centre for Health-Related Research, Bangor University; Co-Convenor, Qualitative Methods Research Group
How can we improve the quality of reviews?
David Tovey, Editor in Chief, The Cochrane Library




dg
Most patients aren't aware that they can be used as props in the operating room and I'm sure the hospitals and doctors want it that way. The operating room has always been known to medical students as a great place to "steal" their learning from the patient. I think what's unnerving is the vision of many students waiting their turn in line to practice on an unconscious patient.
How could this possibly be an issue or a problem? How could it NOT be feasible to require prior consent? Likely the feasibility question concerns the medical schools' fear that if they ask patients for consent, they'll get more refusals than they can abide.
I consider this practice to be extremely unethical and leaves women open to abuse.
Where are the ethics committees when it comes to issues like this?
If it is not ABSOLUTELY CLEAR to the patient that a specific exam is part of the process, AND that participation means a supervised student may do such an exam, then you don't have informed consent. Period.
And you sure don't get that by having the patient sign a pile of forms a few hours ahead of a procedure, or assuming they know what "participate" in operation means. Stand and watch? Help monitor? Hold a kidney? I don't object to being a learning tool, but I expect to be asked specifically, simply and clearly.
"is it common practice when women are undergoing any procedure to have pelvic exams while under anaesthesia?"
My heart sank when I read that question. I would love to know this too (while at the same time I dread the answer).
I'd also like to know, are men's bodies used in this experimental way? Do students practice examinations on men for testicular or prostate cancer while they are unconscious?
Sandi, I hope you'll keep us posted if you hear anything about this. Thank you.
My heart sank when I read that question. I would love to know this too (while at the same time I dread the answer).
I think from some of the poll responses and comments, it is common contrary to what may think. Surgical patients of any kind, male or female should be getting on the bandwagon on this issue. The best way to bring this issue forward is to blog,email,FB and Twitter the ethics of the issue in the public domain. I wonder what husbands/partners feel about this?
A lot of debates resulted from the expose, but the doctors and hospitals were defiant in their "right" to use patient bodies in the OR as teaching props with the reasoning that a doctor can't learn just by observing. And that the patient isn't harmed. In any debate, they were uniformly indignant at revealing anything that goes on in the OR to the public because of the fear "one foot in door, what next will they demand. And the threat that if there is interference, then patient care will suffer.
Here are a few news links addressing this issue.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A36990-2003May9¬Found=true
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=880120
(yes, men are used as props too)
http://www.menshealth.com/men/health/other-diseases-ailments/are-med-students-practicing-on-you/article/fb2a99edbbbd201099edbbbd2010cfe793cd
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CYD/is_13_38/ai_105514181/
http://jamwa.amwa-doc.org/index.cfm?objectid=C7EE5996-D567-0B25-50D3DA2B7834FEE5
1) http://upalumni.org/medschool/appendices/appendix-37.html
2) http://upalumni.org/medschool/appendices/appendix-49.html