Do you think environmental factors contributed to your cancer?
This poll is not conducted scientifically and represents the opinions of site visitors. (to answer yes or no click on the survey below)
Survey
| Sponsor: | University of Washington |
|---|---|
| Information provided by (Responsible Party): | Elizabeth Swisher, University of Washington |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01544049 |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2016 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | February 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
"Despite a re-evaluation of risks in recent years, hormone replacement therapy is still surrounded by controversy. Almost 30% of women in a recent survey sought a natural approach to combat climacteric symptoms. Nevertheless, a large proportion of patients felt that they wanted a good safety profile and strong evidence base for treatment. This article seeks to review the evidence supporting non-hormonal approaches to treatment. There is only conflicting evidence at best to support alpha-2 agonists, e.g. clonidine and limited evidence for dihydroepiandrosterone and natural progesterones. There is limited randomized controlled trial data for gabapentin, selective norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), many of these studies being related to breast cancer patients. Of the herbal medicinal products, the largest evidence base rests with phytoestrogens. A Cochrane Database review looking at all types of phytoestrogens, e.g. red clover extracts, dietary soya and soya extracts concluded that there was no evidence to support improvement in climacteric symptoms and the meta-analysis of a 178 studies on soy products was inconsistent. Nevertheless, other studies disagree. Mammographic density is not affected by soy or phytoestrogen products and recent in vitro work shows only a weakly proliferative effect of soy isoflavone on breast cancer cells and evidence that soy isoflavone blocks the proliferative effect of estradiol on these cells. There are no studies looking at clinical outcome measures for cardiovascular disease but a number of studies looking at biochemical markers including arterial wall stiffness and apolipo protein B. Recent studies have also looked at the effects of red clover isoflavone on mood and depression, using specific depression rating scales. Finally, it is important to note that herbal medicinal products should not be used without caution. Some may produce quite marked side-effects in high doses and others can interact with pre-existing medication. A strategy for which patients are suitable for herbal medicinal products is reviewed."
| Abstract |
|---|
| BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) often complicates the clinical course of cancer disease. The risk is further increased by chemotherapy but the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Primary thromboprophylaxis with LMWH significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic VTE in ambulatory cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. However, the lack of power hampers definite conclusions on the effects on major safety outcomes, which mandates additional studies to determine the risk to benefit ratio of LMWH in this setting. |
| Comments from Clinical Raters |
|---|
| Oncology - Breast |
| Company/Products | Reason | Related Information |
|---|---|---|
| Sandoz: 1-800-525-8747 6 mg/mL injection 30 mg/5 mL vial (NDC 66578-0043-01) 100 mg/16.7 mL vial (NDC 66578-0043-02) 300 mg/50 mL vial (NDC 66578-0043-03) | Manufacturing delays | Sandoz is currently on backorder. |
| APP 1-888-386-1300 6 mg/mL injection 30 mg/5 mL vial (NDC 63323-0763-05) 100 mg/16.7 mL vial (NDC 63323-0763-16) 300 mg/50 mL vial (NDC 63323-0763-50) | Increase in demand | APP is on intermittent back order and is releasing product as it becomes available. |
| Hospira Inc. Customer Service: 1-877-946-7747 300 mg/50 mL vial (NDC 0409-0342-50) 30 mg/5 mL vial (NDC 0409-0342-09) 100 mg/16.7 mL vial (NDC 0409-0342-22) | Higher than anticipated market demand. |
Product 30 mg/5 mL vial (NDC 0409-0342-09): ample levels of inventory to support market demand.
Product 300 mg/50 mL vial (NDC 0409-0342-50): next delivery March. Product 100 mg/16.7 mL vial (NDC 0409-0342-22): next delivery April. Please check with your wholesaler for available inventory. |
| Bedford Laboratories 1-800-562-4797 6 mg/mL injection 30 mg/5 mL vial (NDC 55390-0114-05) 100 mg/16.7 mL vial (NDC 55390-0114-20) 300 mg/50 mL vial (NDC 55390-0114-50) | Manufacturing delays | Bedford has all paclitaxel presentations on backorder and the company cannot estimate a release date. |
| Teva 1-800-545-8800 6 mg/mL injection 30 mg/5 mL vial (NDC 00703-4764-01) 100 mg/16.7 mL vial (NDC 00703-4766-01) 150 mg/25 mL vial (NDC 00703-4767-01) 300 mg/50 mL vial (NDC 00703-4768-01) | Manufacturing delays | Teva continues to release Paclitaxel 30mg/5mL vial (NDC 00703-4764-01), Paclitaxel 100mg/16.7mL vial (NDC 00703-4766-01), Paclitaxel 150mg/25mL (NDC 00703-4767-01) and Paclitaxel 300mg/50mL (NDC 00703-4768-01) as it becomes available |
| Sagent Pharmaceticals 1-866-625-1618 30mg/5mL NDC 25021-213-05 100mg/16.7mL NDC 25021-213-17 300mg/50mL NDC 25021-213-50 | Sagent has the 5mL and 16.7mL on allocation and the 50mL product is available. |
| Amlodipine is used alone or in combination with other medications to treat high blood pressure and chest pain (angina). Amlodipine is in a class of medications called calcium channel blockers. It lowers blood pressure by relaxing the blood vessels so the heart does not have to pump as hard. It controls chest pain ... | |
| Side effects - How to take - Precautions - Dietary Instructions - Missed a dose | |
"Caring and compassion were once often the only “treatment” available to clinicians. Over time, advances in medical science have provided new options that, although often improving outcomes, have inadvertently distanced physicians from their patients. The result is a health care environment in which patients and their families are often excluded from important discussions and left feeling in the dark about how their problems are being managed and how to navigate the overwhelming array of diagnostic and treatment options available to them..........If we can view the health care experience through the patient's eyes, we will become more responsive to patients' needs and, thereby, better clinicians. Recognition of shared decision making as the pinnacle of patient-centered care is overdue. We will have succeeded in building a truly patient-centered health care system when an informed woman can decide whether to have a screening mammogram and an informed man can consider whether to have a screening prostate-specific–antigen test without their clinicians labeling the decision “wrong” on the basis of different values and preferences.Nothing about me without me.— Valerie Billingham, Through the Patient's Eyes, Salzburg Seminar Session 356, 1998
This study assessed toxicity in advanced cancer patients treated in a phase I clinic that focuses on targeted agents.
Patients and methods:An analysis of database records of 1181 consecutive patients with advanced cancer who were treated in the phase I program starting 1 January 2006 was carried out.
Results:All patients were treated on at least 1 of the 82 phase I clinical trials. Overall, 56 trials (68.3%) had only targeted agents, 13 (15.9%) only cytotoxics, and 13 (15.9%) targeted and cytotoxic agents. Rates of grade 3 and 4 toxicity that were at least possibly drug related were 7.1% and 3.2%, respectively, and 5 of the 1181 patients (0.4%) died from toxicity that was at least possibly drug related. The most common grade 3 or more toxic effects were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, dehydration, infection, altered mental status, bleeding, vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status greater than zero and use of a cytotoxic agent were selected as independent factors associated with serious toxicity.
Conclusion:Phase I trials of primarily targeted agents showed low rates of toxicity, with 10.3% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicity and a 0.4% rate of death, at least possibly drug related.
| Document Type: | Grants Notice |
| Funding Opportunity Number: | W81XWH-12-OCRP-OCA |
| Opportunity Category: | Discretionary |
| Posted Date: | Feb 27, 2012 |
| Creation Date: | Feb 27, 2012 |
| Original Closing Date for Applications: | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Current Closing Date for Applications: | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Archive Date: | Aug 17, 2012 |
| Funding Instrument Type: | Cooperative Agreement Grant |
| Category of Funding Activity: | Science and Technology and other Research and Development |
| Category Explanation: | |
| Expected Number of Awards: | 2 |
| Estimated Total Program Funding: | $2,400,000 |
| Award Ceiling: | |
| Award Floor: | |
| CFDA Number(s): | 12.420 -- Military Medical Research and Development |
| Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement: | No |
Eligible Applicants
Agency Name
Description
Link to Full Announcement
The POWER Study (Project for an Ontario Women's Health Evidence-based Report) Social Determinants of Health and Populations at Risk chapter is now available for download. Using a community-engaged research model and integrated KT approach, the POWER Study has examined a comprehensive set of evidence-based indicators bridging population health and health system performance. The Women's Health Equity Report is serving as an evidence-based tool for policy makers, providers and consumers in their efforts to improve health and reduce health inequities in Ontario. POWER has examined gender differences in access to care, as well as quality and outcomes of care for the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the province and how they differ by gender, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and geography. The Social Determinants of Health and Populations at Risk chapter examines the social determinants of health among Ontario's women and men including: low income, low education, indicators of employment, lone-parent families, and food insecurity. We also summarize the POWER Study indicators across all chapters as they relate to low-income populations, providing a synthesis of health functional status, risk factors and prevention, access to health care services, clinical management, and health outcomes of lower-income adults. The final section re-examines and synthesizes the POWER Study findings in relation to immigrant and minority populations, as well as reporting three indicators of immigrant women's health that have not previously been reported in the POWER Study. Based on our analyses, identified opportunities to improve health and health care and reduce inequities, together with broad community consultation and dialogue, we developed the POWER Health Equity Road Map. The aim of the Road Map is to help move us forward to the goal of achieving health equity in Ontario. The time to move forward is now. What is needed is the will and commitment. To download a copy of the full chapter or the highlights document (which outlines the chapter's key findings and messages): http://powerstudy.ca/the-power-report/the-power-report-volume-2/social-determinants-of-health-and-populations-at-risk The French translation of the Social Determinants of Health and Populations at Risk Highlights document will be available on our website soon. Also available for download from www.powerstudy.ca: Introduction to the POWER Study (Ch 1); The POWER Study Framework (Ch 2); Burden of Illness (Ch 3); Cancer (Ch 4); Depression (Ch 5), Cardiovascular Disease (Ch 6), Access to Health Care Services (Ch 7), Musculoskeletal Conditions (Ch 8), Diabetes (Ch 9), Reproductive and Gynaecological Health (Ch 10), HIV Infection (Ch 11), Older Women's Health Report. The POWER Study's concluding chapter 'Achieving Health Equity in Ontario: Opportunities for Intervention and Improvement' is forthcoming and will be available on our website soon. Arlene S. Bierman, MD, MS Echo's Ontario Women's Health Council Chair in Women's Health Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto and Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital 30 Bond Street (209 Victoria Street, Room 219) Toronto, ON M5B 1W8 Phone: (416) 864-3041 Fax: (416) 864-5641 Web: www.powerstudy.ca The POWER Study is funded by Echo: Improving Women's Health in Ontario, an agency of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. This report does not necessarily reflect the views of Echo or the Ministry. _______________________________________________
| Sponsor: | Catholic University of the Sacred Heart |
|---|---|
| Information provided by (Responsible Party): | Prof. Giovanni Scambia, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01539785 |
| Sponsor: | Gynecologic Oncology Group |
|---|---|
| Collaborator: | National Cancer Institute (NCI) |
| Information provided by: | National Cancer Institute (NCI) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01540565 |
Past studies of the human intestinal microbiota are potentially confounded by the common practice of using bowel-cleansing preparations. We examined if colonic lavage changes the natural state of enteric mucosal-adherent microbes in healthy human subjects.
Standard bowel cleansing preparation altered the mucosal-adherent microbiota in all of our subjects, although the degree of change was variable. These findings underscore the importance of considering the confounding effects of bowel preparation when designing experiments exploring the gut microbiota.
"We recommend that future investigations of the human enteric microbiota include un-prepped subjects in whom the natural state of the colonic microbiota can be preserved and observed. Acquisition of left sided colon samples should not be a major problem, but obtaining right side colonic samples will be more technically demanding; potentially requiring conscious sedation and increasing risk and duration of colonoscopic procedures. Nonetheless, in the hands of an experienced endoscopist, full colonoscopy in un-prepped individuals is feasible. Our group has an 80% success rate reaching the cecum in un-prepped patients.
In summary, we report that the routine practice of colonic lavage may significantly alter the mucosa-associated microbiota of the distal human colon. While the effects are obvious in some individuals, the effects of colonic lavage can be unpredictable. Given that colonic lavage has the potential to distort the enteric microbiota, we recommend that future studies of the human enteric microbiota be performed on the un-prepped colon where the natural state of both luminal and mucosa-associated microbiota is most likely to be retained.