Blogger's Note/Opinion: the actual paper published in the CMAJ is not an open access publication which defies logic given the subject matter- see below for CMAJ and following is the 'public' press release; as mentioned, but focused on institutional control, the other issue is the matter of who/what/control is included in a patient charter (see prior CMAJ publications on this issue); note also that 'professional Patient Navigators' in hospitals play in role, however, this is
not an independent process/role; the role of an ombudsun has been a matter of great discussion over decades
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A patient charter of rights: how to avoid a toothless tiger and achieve system improvement
April 23, 2012
Many countries have
adopted patient charters of rights, but to be meaningful, such charters
must include an economical, accessible
and independent complaints process.
According to Flood and May, an ombudsman or commissioner can help reduce
litigation and
formal disciplinary proceedings
against health care professionals.
Full article
This item requires a subscription to Canadian Medical Association Journal.
Full Text (PDF)
Analysis
- Colleen M. Flood and
- Kathryn May
A patient charter of rights: how to avoid a toothless tiger and achieve system improvement CMAJ cmaj.111050; published ahead of print April 23, 2012,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Canadian provinces need to adopt a patient charter of rights
Public release date: 23-Apr-2012
[
Print
|
E-mail
|
Share
]
[
Close Window ]
Contact: Kim Barnhardt
kim.barnhardt@cmaj.ca
613-520-7116 x2224
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Canadian provinces need to adopt a patient charter of rights
Canadian provinces should adopt a patient charter of rights with
independent enforcement as part of the move to patient-centred care,
argues an analysis article in CMAJ (
Canadian Medical Association Journal).
A properly designed patient charter of rights (
standards set by whom?) can help patients
resolve concerns and complaints easily and cost-effectively, through an
independent ombudsman or commissioner. An effective patient charter
contains clearly articulated patient rights — many of which are already
provided in law but scattered in different places — such as patients'
rights to access their health records, to privacy and to informed
consent.
Many countries such as New Zealand, Norway, Finland, England, Israel
have patient charters.
Quebec is the only jurisdiction in Canada with a
charter. Alberta has recently enacted one, but it lacks the critical
feature of independent enforcement.
Health professionals may have concerns that patient charters will
increase lawsuits or disciplinary actions, but evidence shows that
"patient charters with dedicated complaints processes enable matters to
be resolved at an early stage by informal means, averting the need for
litigation or formal disciplinary proceedings," write Colleen Flood and
Kathryn May, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto. In New Zealand, for
example, formal disciplinary actions against providers have plummeted
because a patient commissioner mediates patient complaints.
An independent health ombudsman can help spur overall improvement in
the system by issuing recommendations or reports on system problems.
Overseas experience suggests that despite having no formal powers to
implement change such recommendations can nonetheless be a powerful
force for change.
"A patient charter of rights should achieve greater clarity and
awareness of the nature and extent of patients' rights; if
well-designed, it should also help drive improvements in the quality and
timeliness of care, improve the overall accountability of members of
the health care system and reduce costly litigation," the authors
conclude. "However, experience shows that it is easy for a
patient
charter to be a toothless tiger — that is, a mechanism to merely talk
about improving the patient experience and reforming the health care
system."
