this is not a singular issue - as reported in the Toronto Star: "The Unkindest Cut"

Here is what this particular article today (link at the end of this note)
does not say with respect to other gynecologists all working in my own
area in the past few years:

1) Centenary Hospital (Scarborough, Ontario) vs Armstrong: case before
the courts (I am not aware if the courts have made their final decision
on this one):
Hansard:
http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/simpleSearch.do?language=en&requestOrigin=requestSimpleOrAdvanced&defaultQuery=armstrong+vs+centenary&queryMethod=allQuery&Search=Search
http://www.canlii.org/on/cas/onca/2005/2005onca10427.html

Armstrong v. Centenary Health Centre

Citation : 2002 CanLII 42546 (ON S.C.) Date: December 20, 2002
Language: en
Ontario > Superior Court of Justice

Armstrong v. Centenary Health Centre
Citation : 2005 CanLII 20712 (ON C.A.) Date: June 13, 2005 Language: en
Ontario > Court of Appeal for Ontario


2) Whitby (Ontario) obstetrician-gynecologist Dr. Errol Wai-Ping
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/donoharm.html

3) Dr. Richard Neale, a gynecologist and obstetrician, who worked in
Durham Region (Ajax/Pickering) and was prohibited from practicing in
Ontario before
he returned to England. (note: his licence was taken away while
practicing in England)
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/163/5/584-a


4) Toronto obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. Richard Austin
http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/193080

_*The unkindest cut TheStar.com - News - The unkindest cut*_
March 17, 2007