abstract: Messenger RNA expression and methylation of candid tumor suppressor genes and risk of ovarian cancer (serous cell type) Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Saturday, August 07, 2010

abstract: Messenger RNA expression and methylation of candid tumor suppressor genes and risk of ovarian cancer (serous cell type)



Note: edited stats for ease of reading (italics)

Abstract

To investigate the association of expression and promoter methylation of tumor-suppressor genes with risk of ovarian cancer, we conducted a case-control study of 102 patients with serous epithelial ovarian cancer and 100 patients without ovarian cancers.

We measured mRNA expression levels (by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) and methylation status (by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction) of five candidate genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, hMLH1 (Lynch Syndrome gene) , MGMT, and DNMT3B) in tumors from the cases and normal ovaries from the controls.

We found that mRNA expression levels of the five genes were decreased in tumors than in normal ovaries with 0.39-fold for BRCA1, 0.25-fold for BRCA2, 0.42-fold for hMLH1, 0.45-fold for MGMT, and 0.87-fold for DNMT3B, calculated by the 2(-DeltaDeltaCT) method.

Ovarian cancer risk (odds ratios, ORs) was associated with low expression of all genes

2.95 for BRCA1,

3.65 for BRCA2,

5.25 for hMLH1 (one of the Lynch Syndrome genes)

However, methylation status was not associated with gene expression levels in the tumors, except for hMLH1 whose mean (+/- SD) gene expression was significantly lower in methylated (13.0 +/- 7.6) than in unmethylated (31.2 +/- 44.8) tumors (P < 0.001).

We concluded that low mRNA expression of these tumor-suppressor genes, likely due to molecular mechanisms in addition to the promoter methylation in some instances, may be a biomarker for ovarian cancer risk in this study population. Larger studies are needed to validate our findings.

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.