EvidenceUpdates - abstract/commentaries: Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicentre r Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

EvidenceUpdates - abstract/commentaries: Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicentre r



 Note: this study was originally published in The Lancet and involved patients in 25 hospitals; the study pertained to left-sided colorectal cancers however may be appropriate/of interest to other cancer patient populations; commentaries are included from a variety of professions including gastroenterologist, oncologists...

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BACKGROUND: Colonic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery is an alternative for emergency surgery in patients with acute malignant colonic obstruction, but its benefits are uncertain. We aimed to establish whether colonic stenting has better health outcomes than does emergency surgery.


INTERPRETATION: Colonic stenting has no decisive clinical advantages to emergency surgery. It could be used as an alternative treatment in as yet undefined subsets of patients, although with caution because of concerns about tumour spread caused by perforations.

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.