Outcomes Research Institute Releases Priorities - in Public Health & Policy, General Professional Issues from MedPage Today - comments until March 15 Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Outcomes Research Institute Releases Priorities - in Public Health & Policy, General Professional Issues from MedPage Today - comments until March 15



WASHINGTON -- The new institute created by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to study which medical treatments are the most effective will focus on broad areas of healthcare instead of specific drugs or procedures, according to a draft of its research priorities.
The institute, called the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), is a nonprofit organization with a 21-member board that will identify areas that can benefit from comparative effectiveness research, fund the research through $3 billion in grants over the next decade, and provide patients and clinicians with research findings.
Opponents of the healthcare reform law charge that PCORI will make decisions that will lead to clinical rationing.
Supporters of the ACA, however, say comparative effectiveness research is crucial to improving the U.S. healthcare system and that it won't lead to denying access to certain drugs or procedures. The law specifically prohibits the panel's recommendations from being "construed as mandates for practice guidelines, coverage recommendations, payment, or policy recommendations."........
.....................................................................................................................
In draft recommendations released Monday, the PCORI board identified five broad areas where it determined comparative effectiveness research is needed. They are:
  • Assessment of options for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, with research focusing on patient preferences and decision-making as well as various factors that may affect patient outcomes.
  • Improving healthcare systems, including focusing on coordination of care for patients with multiple medical conditions, and how use of nonphysician providers affects patient outcomes.
  • Communication and dissemination of research, including ways to provide information to patients that helps them to talk with their healthcare providers about it, and ways to use electronic data (e-records) to support decision-making.
  • Addressing disparities, including ensuring that research into the benefits and risks of various medical options addresses the needs of all patient populations.
  • Designing "quick, safe, and efficient" patient-centered outcomes research and methodological research, and studying ways to improve the quality and usefulness of clinical data and follow-up studies.
"These priorities and agenda give a framework to and identify the broad questions that must be addressed so that patients can make better and more personalized decisions in partnership with their clinicians across all areas of health," said PCORI Executive Director Joe Selby, MD, MPH, in a press release.
Selby added that the early agenda is a starting point and PCORI hopes that patients, healthcare providers, and others will provide feedback and "think boldly" about research projects in all five areas.
The draft will be available for public comment until March 15, and PCORI will hold a public meeting in Washington on Feb. 27.

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.