|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psychological distress in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients following microsatellite instability testing for Lynch syndrome on the pathologist’s initiative
"....One limitation of our study was the low response rate
in the eligible patients. This may have biased our results, especially
if the surgeons had consciously avoided recruiting
patients with a (very) poor prognosis or emotional problems. Such bias
would have resulted in underestimation of psychological
distress. At present, we cannot assess whether bias was present.
However,
we note that in our sample, the levels of psychological
distress were lower than those described in the literature.
Another
reason for the low response rate may have been the
complex logistic inclusion procedure [15],
if communication of the test result to the patient exceeded the
inclusion criterion of 6 months. In some cases, it took
several months before the MSI-test report, written by the
pathologist, was sent to the surgeon and a number of weeks more
before the patient was contacted. Another limitation of
our study was that no firm conclusions could be drawn, because the
large number of tests increased the possibility of a type
I error, which we have not corrected for.
Despite some methodological concerns, we
can conclude that moderate levels of distress were present following MSI
testing
in patients recently diagnosed with CRC. These levels
were similar to those in other patients diagnosed with CRC [27, 47, 48].
High cancer-specific distress was observed in 40% of the MSI-positive patients and was significantly correlated with female
gender."
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.