|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
".....Furthermore, our case illustrates that the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) metric is unreliable in predicting the histopathological treatment response in carcinosarcomas. In our patient, pathological analyses of the tissue removed during the debulking surgery showed more than 75% pathological necrosis, whereas the CT scan revealed stable disease. Furthermore, changes in tumor size evaluated on the CT scan after the treatment with PLD were poorly correlated with the metabolic changes and the tumoral viability (and outcome). A recent study showed that FDG-PET was significantly more accurate than size-based criteria at assessing the histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-grade, soft-tissue sarcomas (Evilevitch et al., 2008). In our opinion, FDG-PET should be considered as a modality to monitor the treatment response in patients with carcinosarcoma of the ovary.
In conclusion, our case illustrates that PLD might have a role in the treatment of ovarian carcinosarcoma that should be evaluated in future studies. This case also emphasizes the need to monitor the treatment response in these patients with FDG-PET."
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.