|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blogger's Note: worthwhile reading/pondering...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Is Rarely the Easy Way Out
To the Editor:
I appreciate the thoughtful analysis by Chi et al1 in the November 1 issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology,
in the article entitled, “Is the Easier Way Ever the Better Way?” Chi
et al make a very literate argument against using
neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for ovarian cancer,
continuing a discussion that has lingered among oncologists for more
than
25 years. The argument has heated up recently as a
result of several prospective studies, particularly that of Vergote et
al,2 which showed no difference in survival in patients treated with either primary surgery or NACT.
I must, however, disagree with Chi et al1
on two points. The first of these is the suggestion by the authors that
patients with stage IIIC/IV ovarian cancer should
routinely be referred to ultraspecialist centers
that are capable of performing advanced upper abdominal surgery. In
reality,
the great majority of patients with ovarian cancer
in the United States have been and will be treated in community settings
for the foreseeable future. The professional
societies that represent gynecologic oncology have for years strongly
recommended
that ovarian cancer be handled by
fellowship-trained gynecologic oncologists. This effort has met with
mixed success; in many
communities it is still the norm for women with
advanced ovarian cancer to be operated on by physicians with no special
oncologic
surgical training.......plus references:
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.