March 2012 - open access - International Perspectives on Patient Engagement: Results from the 2011 Commonwealth Fund Survey + link to separate blog posting - related issue...Engaging the Already Engaged - 2/2012

International Perspectives on Patient Engagement: Results from the 2011 Commonwealth Fund Survey - The Commonwealth Fund

Key Findings

• To assess the level of patients’ engagement with their regular doctors, the researchers analyzed responses to survey items on whether the doctor spends enough time with patients, explains things in a way that is easy to understand, and encourages questions. Patients in Norway and Sweden were the least likely to be engaged by their regular providers, with only about one of three responding positively to all three questions. At the top end of the range, at least two of three patients in Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, the U.K., and the U.S. reported positive care interactions.
• In seven of the 11 countries—Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the U.K., and the U.S.—patients with below-average incomes were significantly less likely to have been engaged by their regular doctor in their care. The U.S. stood out for the widest income-based disparities.
• Survey participants were asked how often the specialist physicians treating them provide opportunities to ask questions about recommended treatments, tell them about their treatment choices, and involve them as much as they would like in decisions about their care. Four-fifths of patients in Switzerland and the U.K. replied “always” or “often” to all three questions, as did two-thirds or more of Dutch, New Zealand, and U.S. respondents. Respondents in France, Germany, Norway, and Sweden were the least likely to report shared decision-making with specialists.
• In all countries, patients reporting positive communication and engagement with their regular doctor were far more likely to rate the quality of care they received in the past year as “excellent” or “very good.” The difference was greatest in the U.S.: 78 percent of patients who said they were engaged in their care rated the quality of their care highly, compared with 43 percent of those who said they were not engaged.
• Engaged patients were also less likely to report a medical, medication, or lab test error in the past two years, and had more positive views of the health system as a whole.  

 

                                              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

OVARIAN CANCER and US: the Commonwealth Fund (Harvard ...

Feb 21, 2012

Tuesday, February 21, 2012. the Commonwealth Fund (Harvard): Who Are We Reaching Through the Patient Portal: Engaging the Already Engaged? http://tinyurl.com/6tqadrd. Blogger Sandi Pniauskas at Tuesday, February 21, 2012 ...