|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
......Of course, considering that the predictive power of genetic
testing tends to be underwhelming, perhaps it’s no surprise that
personalized genetic information induces more shoulder
shrugs than lifestyle changes. “One of the challenges is that people
are behaving rationally, to a degree, when they don’t
change their behaviours. These genetic tests aren’t very predictive,”
says Timothy Caulfield, a Canada Research Chair in
Health Law and Technology who teaches in the law faculty and school of
public health at the University of Alberta. “If you
find you have a health risk of 2% instead of 1%, that type of risk is
lost in the noise of risk in your life.”
Editor’s note: Sixth of a multipart series on genetic testing.
Part 1: Separating hype from reality in the era of the affordable genome (www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-4143).
Part 2: Popping the genetics bubble (www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-4142).
Part 3: Who should hold the keys to your DNA? (www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-4141).
Part 4: A race-based detour to personalized medicine (www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-4133).
Part 5: Race and genetics in the doctor’s office (www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-4134).
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.