|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuity clinics in oncology training programs in Canada | Croke | Current Oncology
"Level of Supervision
Most
pd
s and trainees felt that the staff oncologist should review the
patient with the trainee only when the trainee raises concerns (57% vs.
59%), but only 37% of patients shared that view (
p
= 0.0002). Conversely, 63% of patients felt that the staff
oncologist should review the patient with the trainee at every visit,
either inside (27%) or outside (36%) the exam room (Figure 1)."
"Patient Participation
Of patient respondents, 48% (46 of 95) responded that
they would feel comfortable having a trainee conduct the initial
consult, and 66% (63 of 95) stated they would feel comfortable with a
trainee making treatment recommendations. The main concerns about
cc
s highlighted by patients included the potential for
discontinuity of care as residents rotate through the clinic, a lack of
experience on the part of the trainee, and a lack of competence for
clinical decision-making. Patients stated that potential benefits
include the possibility that trainees may have more time to spend with
patients and that
cc
s may decrease overall wait times. Furthermore, many patients indicated a desire to participate in trainee education."
Conclusions
Continuity clinics are considered beneficial by
pd
s and trainees. Patients desire more trainee supervision than the trainees themselves and the
pd
s do, a factor that should be considered when implementing a
cc
.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.