Abstract
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer are commonly diagnosed cancers in Canada. Patients diagnosed with early-stage non-small cell lung, breast, or colorectal cancer
represent potentially curable populations. For these patients, surgery
is the primary mode of treatment, with (neo)adjuvant therapies (e.g.,
chemotherapy, radiotherapy) recommended according to disease stage. Data
from our research in Nova Scotia, as well as others', demonstrate that a
substantial proportion of non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer
patients, for whom practice guidelines recommend (neo)adjuvant therapy,
are not referred for an oncologist consultation. Conversely,
surveillance data and clinical experience suggest that breast cancer
patients have much higher referral rates. Since surgery is the primary
treatment, the surgeon plays a major role in referring patients to
oncologists. Thus, an improved understanding of how surgeons make
decisions related to oncology services is important to developing
strategies to optimize referral rates. Few studies have examined
decision making for (neo)adjuvant therapy from the perspective of the cancer
surgeon. This study will use qualitative methods to examine
decision-making processes related to referral to oncology services for
individuals diagnosed with potentially curable non-small cell lung,
breast, or colorectal cancer.
METHODS:
A
qualitative study will be conducted, guided by the principles of
grounded theory. The study design is informed by our ongoing research,
as well as a model of access to health services. The method of data
collection will be in-depth, semi structured interviews. We will attempt
to recruit all lung, breast, and/or colorectal cancer
surgeons in Nova Scotia (n [almost equal to] 42), with the aim of
interviewing a minimum of 34 surgeons. Interviews will be audiotaped and
transcribed verbatim. Data will be collected and analyzed concurrently,
with two investigators independently coding and analyzing the data.
Analysis will involve an inductive, grounded approach using constant
comparative analysis.
DISCUSSION:
The primary outcomes
will be (1) identification of the patient, surgeon, institutional, and
health-system factors that influence surgeons' decisions to refer
non-small cell lung, breast, and colorectal cancer
patients to oncology services when consideration for (neo)adjuvant
therapy is recommended and (2) identification of potential strategies
that could optimize referral to oncology for appropriate individuals.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.