|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reproductive characteristics in relation to ovarian cancer risk by histologic pathways
Author Affiliations
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do reproductive risk factor associations differ across subgroups of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) defined by the
dualistic model (type I/II) or a histologic pathway-based classification?
SUMMARY ANSWER Associations with parity, history of endometriosis, tubal ligation and hysterectomy were found to differ in the context of
the type I/II and the histologic pathways classification of ovarian cancer.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Shared molecular alterations and candidate precursor lesions suggest that tumor histology and grade may be used to classify
ovarian tumors into likely etiologic pathways.
DESIGN This
case–control study included 1571 women diagnosed with invasive EOC and
2100 population-based controls that were enrolled
from 1992 to 2008. Reproductive risk factors as
well as other putative risk factors for ovarian cancer were assessed
through
in-person interviews.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Eligible cases were diagnosed with incident ovarian cancer, were aged
18 and above and resided in eastern Massachusetts or
New Hampshire, USA. Controls were identified
through random digit dialing, drivers' license and town resident lists
and were
frequency matched with the cases based on age
and study center.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
We used polytomous logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs)
and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for type I/II EOC
or using a pathway-based grouping of histologic
subtypes. In multivariate analyses, we observed that having a history of
endometriosis
(OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.36–2.71) increased the
risk for a type I tumor. Factors that were strongly inversely associated
with
risk for a type I tumor included parity (≥3
versus 0 children, OR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.21), having a previous
tubal ligation
(OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26–0.60) and more weakly
hysterectomy (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.45–1.13). In analyses of histologic
pathways,
parity (≥3 versus 0 children, OR = 0.13, 95% CI:
0.10–0.18) and having a previous tubal ligation (OR = 0.41, 95% CI:
0.28–0.60)
or hysterectomy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34–0.86)
were inversely associated with risk of endometrioid/clear cell tumors.
Having
a history of endometriosis strongly increased
the risk for endometrioid/clear cell tumors (OR = 2.41, 95% CI:
1.78–3.26).
We did not observe significant differences in
the risk associations across these tumor classifications for age at
menarche,
menstrual cycle length or infertility.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
A potential limitation of this study is that dividing the cases into
subgroups may limit the power of these analyses, particularly
for the less common tumor types. Since cases
were enrolled after their diagnosis, it is possible that the most
aggressive
cases were not included in the study.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
This study provides insights about the role of reproductive factors in
relation to risk of pathway-based subgroups of ovarian
cancer that with further confirmation may assist
with the development of improved strategies for the prevention of these
different
tumor types.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research is funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute, the Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program
and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. The authors have no competing interests to declare.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.