Abstract
PURPOSE:
Indirect
evidence from experimental and epidemiological studies suggests that
prolactin may be involved in ovarian cancer development. However, the
relationship between circulating prolactin levels and risk of ovarian
cancer is unknown.
METHODS:
We conducted a nested
case-control study of 230 cases and 432 individually matched controls
within three prospective cohorts to evaluate whether
pre-diagnostic
circulating prolactin is associated with subsequent risk of ovarian
cancer. We also assessed whether lifestyle and reproductive factors are
associated with circulating prolactin among controls.
RESULTS:
Prolactin
levels were significantly lower among post- versus pre-menopausal
women, parous versus nulliparous women, and past versus never users of
oral contraceptives in our cross-sectional analysis of controls. In our
nested case-control study, we observed a non-significant positive
association between circulating prolactin and ovarian cancer risk
(OR(Q4vsQ1) 1.56, 95 % CI 0.94, 2.63, p trend 0.15). Our findings were
similar in multivariate-adjusted models and in the subgroup of women who
donated blood ≥5 years prior to diagnosis. We observed a significant
positive association between prolactin and risk for the
subgroup of
women with BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) (OR(Q4vsQ1) 3.10, 95 % CI 1.39, 6.90), but
not for women with BMI <25 kg/m(2) (OR(Q4vsQ1) 0.81, 95 % CI 0.40,
1.64).
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings suggest that prolactin
may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer, particularly in
overweight/obese women. Factors associated with reduced risk of ovarian
cancer, such as parity and use of oral contraceptives, were associated
with lower prolactin levels,
which suggests that modulation of prolactin
may be a mechanism underlying their association with risk.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.