Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH:
The
purposes of this paper are to describe the methods used and the
knowledge gained during a pilot study that evaluated the effects of a
self-management intervention for cancer pain, as well as the adaptations
that were made for a larger clinical trial.
METHODS AND SAMPLE:
In
a randomized controlled trial, the adapted German version of the
PRO-SELF(©) Plus Pain Control Program (PCP), a 10-week intervention to
support self-management of pain in adult oncology outpatients and their
family caregivers, was compared to attention control. Primary endpoints
were average and worst pain measured at 6, 10, 14, and 22 weeks after
enrollment.
KEY RESULTS:
A total of
39 patients (19
intervention, 20 control) were recruited over 18 months. During the
study, inclusion criteria were expanded. Furthermore, the structured
timing of the intervention visits was too static for a dynamic symptom
like cancer pain. The intervention was expanded to include symptoms that
severely impacted pain self-management including chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting.
CONCLUSIONS:
Apart from the
provision of information and skills building, coaching cancer patients
across a complex treatment is an important function of an intervention
to support pain self-management. The pilot study proved to be highly
useful in order to adapt planned study procedures, to balance burden and
benefit for participants, and to customize the intervention to
patients' needs and abilities in order to enhance feasibility and
effectiveness. Findings from this pilot study will be fully integrated
in a larger randomized controlled trial. Clinical trial registration
number: NCT00920504.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.