|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Although advances in genomics during the
last decade have opened new avenues for translational research and
allowed the direct
evaluation of clinical samples, there is still a
need for reliable preclinical models to test therapeutic strategies.
Human
cancer-derived cell lines are the most widely used
models to study the biology of cancer and to test hypotheses to improve
the efficacy of cancer treatment. Since the
development of the first cancer cell line, the clinical relevance of
these models
has been continuously questioned. Based upon recent
studies that have fueled the debate, we review the major events in the
development of the in vitro models and the
emergence of new technologies that have revealed important issues and
limitations
concerning human cancer cell lines as models. All
cancer cell lines do not have equal value as tumor models. Some have
been
successful, whereas others have failed. However,
the success stories should not obscure the growing body of data that
motivates
us to develop new in vitro preclinical models that
would substantially increase the success rate of new in vitro–assessed
cancer treatments.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.