A comparison between an ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an adnexal mass Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Sunday, April 14, 2013

A comparison between an ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an adnexal mass



Abstract


Highlights

► Improved preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses of LR2 over ROMA
 ► ROMA showed less utility to detect cancer in premenopausal patients compared to LR2.
► LR2 missed fewer borderline tumors and early stage invasive cancers than ROMA.

Objective

The identification of novel biomarkers led to the development of the ROMA algorithm incorporating both HE4 and CA125 to predict malignancy in women with a pelvic mass. An ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) developed by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) study offers better diagnostic performance than CA125 alone. In this study we compared the diagnostic accuracy between LR2 and ROMA.

Methods

This study included women with a pelvic mass scheduled for surgery and enrolled in a previous prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Experienced ultrasound examiners, general gynecologists and trainees supervised by one of the experts performed the preoperative transvaginal ultrasound examinations. Serum biomarkers were taken prior to surgery. Accuracy of LR2 and ROMA was estimated at completion of this study and did not form part of the decision making process. Final outcome was histology of removed tissues and surgical stage if relevant.

Results

In total 360 women were evaluated. 216 women had benign disease and 144 a malignancy. Overall test performance of LR2 (AUC 0.952) with 94% sensitivity and 82% specificity was significantly better than ROMA (AUC 0.893) with 84% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Difference in AUC was 0.059 (95% CI: 0.026–0.091; P-value 0.0004). Similar results were obtained when stratified for menopausal status.

Conclusion

LR2 shows a better diagnostic performance than ROMA for the characterization of a pelvic mass in both pre- and postmenopausal women. These findings suggest that HE4 and CA125 may not play an important role in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer if good quality ultrasonography is available.

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.