|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avastin
Background
The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Methods
We sought to identify
randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by searching PubMed and Web of
Science. Outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free
survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events.
Results
Four studies with
4,246 patients were included. Combination of bevacizumab and
chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant improvement in ORR
(OR 2.165, 95 % CI 1.511–3.103) and in PFS (HR 0.691, 95 % CI
0.517–0.865), compared with chemotherapy alone. There was no evidence of
a significant improvement in OS (HR 0.934, 95 % CI 0.826–1.041). It
also had significantly increased risk of gastrointestinal events (OR
2.743, 95 % CI 1.580–4.763; P < 0.001), hypertension (OR 4.630, 95 % CI 3.737 to 5.737; P < 0.001), proteinuria (OR 4.872, 95 % CI 2.617–9.069; P < 0.001), and arterial thromboembolism (OR 1.994, 95 % CI 1.210–3.286; P = 0.007).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis
suggests that the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy offers
meaningful improvement in objective response rate and progression-free
survival in ovarian cancer treatment, but does not benefit overall
survival. It also significantly increased the occurrence of
gastrointestinal events, hypertension, proteinuria, and arterial
thromboembolism.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.