|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
DNA-testing
for BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome is possible from the age of 18 years,
although surveillance usually starts at 25. Some patients regret their
decision of testing before age 25. This retrospective study evaluates
whether the testing age should be above 25 years to prevent adverse
effects such as regret or decisional conflict, by determining the
percentage and characteristics of patients reporting these problems. 111
of 219 patients (51 %) tested for BRCA1/2 mutations or Lynch syndrome
between 18 and 25 years from July 1996 to February 2011, returned
self-report surveys. Primary measures were regret, decisional conflict
and family influence. Secondary measures included quality of life (QoL),
coping style, impact of genetic testing, and risk perception. Median
age was 27 [21-40] years, with 86 % female. 73 % was tested for BRCA1/2,
27 % for Lynch syndrome. Only 3 % reported regret, however 39 % had
moderate (32 %) to severe (7 %) decisional conflict. Regression analysis
revealed that decisional conflict was associated with more
monitoring/neutral coping style (p < 0.03) or paternal/no family
mutation (p < 0.02); there were no differences in QoL, impact or risk
perception. 42 % were mutation carriers, showing equal decisional
conflict to non-carriers. 68 % would recommend testing <25 years;
77 % desired surveillance <25 years if a mutation carrier. Almost no
patient tested for hereditary cancer
between 18 and 25 years regretted this decision. A third reported
retrospective decisional conflict, especially those actively seeking
information when faced with a threat and/or those with a paternal or
unknown inheritance. These patients may benefit from decisional support
and personalized information.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.