|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open access
Results
The development process was very challenging because of the differing perspectives
on care and different organizational structures in specialist care and primary care.
In this study, the disease perspective, being dominant in specialist care, was not
found to be suitable for use in primary health care because of the need to cover a
broader perspective including the patient's functioning, social situation and his
or her preferences. Furthermore, managing several different disease-based care pathways
was found to be unsuitable in home care services, as well as unsuitable for a population
characterized by a substantial degree of comorbidity. The outcome of the development
process was a consensus that outlined a single, common patient-centred care pathway
for transition from hospital to follow-up in primary care. The pathway was suitable
for most common diseases and included functional and social aspects as well as disease
follow-up, thus merging the differing perspectives. The disease-based care pathways
were kept for use within the hospitals.
Conclusions
Disease-based care pathways for older patients were found to be neither feasible nor
sustainable in primary care. A common patient-centred care pathway that could meet
the needs of multi- morbid patients was recommended.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.