|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Context
The
European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline group for upper tract
urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid
clinicians in assessing the current evidence-based management of UTUC
and to incorporate present recommendations into daily clinical practice.
Objective
To provide a brief overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians in their daily clinical practice.
Evidence acquisition
The
recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a
thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified
using a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies
and UTUCs in the literature were searched using Medline with the
following keywords: urinary tract cancer; urothelial carcinomas;
upper urinary tract, carcinoma; renal pelvis; ureter; bladder cancer;
chemotherapy; nephroureterectomy; adjuvant treatment; instillation;
neoadjuvant treatment; recurrence; risk factors; nomogram; and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts.
Evidence synthesis
There
is a lack of data in the current literature to provide strong
recommendations
(ie, grade A) due to the rarity of the disease. A number of recent multicentre studies are now available, and there is a growing interest in UTUC in the recent literature. Overall, 135 references have been included here, but most of these studies are still retrospective analyses. The TNM 2009 classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis as well as radical and conservative treatment (ie, imperative and elective cases); additionally, prognostic factors are discussed. Recommendations are also provided for patient follow-up after different therapeutic options.
(ie, grade A) due to the rarity of the disease. A number of recent multicentre studies are now available, and there is a growing interest in UTUC in the recent literature. Overall, 135 references have been included here, but most of these studies are still retrospective analyses. The TNM 2009 classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis as well as radical and conservative treatment (ie, imperative and elective cases); additionally, prognostic factors are discussed. Recommendations are also provided for patient follow-up after different therapeutic options.
Conclusions
These
guidelines contain information for the management of individual
patients according to a current standardised approach. Physicians must
take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each
individual patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen
including tumour location, grade, and stage; renal function; molecular
marker status; and medical comorbidities.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.