|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Highlights
- •
- Ovarian cancer patients treated with bevacizumab predominantly recurred in lymph nodes.
- •
- Patients on extended bevacizumab treatment presented with fewer symptoms at time of recurrence than those receiving fewer cycles of bevacizumab.
- •
- Radiologic imaging is superior to serum CA-125, symptoms, and physical exam for the detection of recurrent disease in patients treated with bevacizumab.
Objective
To
evaluate patterns of recurrence for ovarian, fallopian tube, and
primary peritoneal cancer patients undergoing extended treatment with
bevacizumab (BEV).
Methods
A
retrospective review of patients with primary ovarian, fallopian tube,
or peritoneal cancer treated with BEV alone or in combination with other
chemotherapy from 2001 to 2011 was performed. Qualified patients were
identified by chemotherapy records. Electronic medical records, labs,
and imaging reports were reviewed and abstracted.
Results
Of
108 patients identified, 89 patients met study criteria by having
disease progression either during treatment with BEV or after
discontinuing BEV without initiating any other treatment. Patients on
extended BEV therapy (> 12 cycles) were more likely to recur in
extra-visceral sites (p = 0.04), especially in lymph nodes (p = 0.0002),
and presented with fewer symptoms at time of recurrence (p = 0.02),
compared to patients who had received ≤ 12 cycles. CA-125 becomes less
reliable for the detection of recurrent disease with extended BEV
therapy (p = 0.03 for ≤ 12 cycles vs. p = 0.08 for > 12 cycles).
Radiology was superior to CA-125, symptom, and physical exam, in
detecting recurrence with extended BEV therapy (all p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Extended
treatment with BEV in ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers
results in alterations in the patterns of recurrence. Radiologic imaging
is more reliable than CA-125, symptoms, or physical exam, in
identifying recurrent disease in patients undergoing BEV treatment. As
novel targeted therapies continue to be employed, guidelines for
gynecologic cancer surveillance must continue to be reexamined.
- ☆
- Presented in part at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer, Los Angeles, California, USA. March 9 – 12, 2013.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.