|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abstract
Purpose
Different rules for
registering multiple primary (MP) cancers are used by cancer registries
throughout the world, making international data comparisons difficult.
This study evaluates the effect of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End
Results (SEER) and International Association of Cancer Registries (IACR)
MP rules on population-based cancer survival estimates.
Methods
Data from five US
states and six metropolitan area cancer registries participating in the
SEER Program were used to estimate age-standardized relative survival
(RS%) for first cancers-only and all first cancers matching the
selection criteria according to SEER and IACR MP rules for all cancer
sites combined and for the top 25 cancer site groups among men and
women.
Results
During 1995–2008, the
percentage of MP cancers (all sites, both sexes) increased 25.4 % by
using SEER rules (from 14.6 to 18.4 %) and 20.1 % by using IACR rules
(from 13.2 to 15.8 %). More MP cancers were registered among females
than among males, and SEER rules registered more MP cancers than IACR
rules (15.8 vs. 14.4 % among males; 17.2 vs. 14.5 % among females). The
top 3 cancer sites with the largest differences were melanoma (5.8 %),
urinary bladder (3.5 %), and kidney and renal pelvis (2.9 %) among
males, and breast (5.9 %), melanoma (3.9 %), and urinary bladder (3.4 %)
among females. Five-year survival estimates (all sites combined)
restricted to first primary cancers-only were higher than estimates by
using first site-specific primaries (SEER or IACR rules), and for 11 of
21 sites among males and 11 of 23 sites among females. SEER estimates
are comparable to IACR estimates for all site-specific cancers and
marginally higher for all sites combined among females (RS 62.28 vs.
61.96 %).
Conclusion
Survival after
diagnosis has improved for many leading cancers. However, cancer
patients remain at risk of subsequent cancers. Survival estimates based
on first cancers-only exclude a large and increasing number of MP
cancers. To produce clinically and epidemiologically relevant and less
biased cancer survival estimates, data on all cancers should be included
in the analysis. The multiple primary rules (SEER or IACR) used to
identify primary cancers do not affect survival estimates if all first
cancers matching the selection criteria are used to produce
site-specific survival estimates.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.