|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Continuity of
care among different clinicians refers to consistent and coherent care
management and good measures are needed.
We conducted a metasummary of qualitative
studies of patients’ experience with care to identify measurable
elements that recur
over a variety of contexts and health conditions
as the basis for a generic measure of management continuity.
METHODS From an
initial list of 514 potential studies (1997–2007), 33 met our criteria
of using qualitative methods and exploring
patients’ experiences of health care from
various clinicians over time. They were coded independently. Consensus
meetings
minimized conceptual overlap between codes.
RESULTS For patients,
continuity of care is experienced as security and confidence rather than
seamlessness. Coordination and information
transfer between professionals are assumed until
proven otherwise. Care plans help clinician coordination but are rarely
discerned
as such by patients. Knowing what to expect and
having contingency plans provides security. Information transfer
includes
information given to the patient, especially to
support an active role in giving and receiving information, monitoring,
and
self-management. Having a single trusted
clinician who helps navigate the system and sees the patient as a
partner undergirds
the experience of continuity between clinicians.
CONCLUSION Some
dimensions of continuity, such as coordination and communication among
clinicians, are perceived and best assessed indirectly
by patients through failures and gaps
(discontinuity). Patients experience continuity directly through
receiving information,
having confidence and security on the care
pathway, and having a relationship with a trusted clinician who anchors
continuity.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.