|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Purpose In clinical
trials, traditional monitoring methods, paper documentation, and
outdated collection systems lead to inaccuracies
of study information and inefficiencies in the
process. Integrated electronic systems offer an opportunity to collect
data
in real time.
Patients and Methods
We created a computer software system to collect 13 patient-reported
symptomatic adverse events and patient-reported Karnofsky
performance status, semi-automated RECIST
measurements, and laboratory data, and we made this information
available to investigators
in real time at the point of care during a phase
II lung cancer trial. We assessed data completeness within 48 hours of
each
visit. Clinician satisfaction was measured.
Results Forty-four
patients were enrolled, for 721 total visits. At each visit,
patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflecting toxicity
and disease-related symptoms were completed
using a dedicated wireless laptop. All PROs were distributed in batch
throughout
the system within 24 hours of the visit, and
abnormal laboratory data were available for review within a median of 6
hours
from the time of sample collection. Manual
attribution of laboratory toxicities took a median of 1 day from the
time they
were accessible online. Semi-automated RECIST
measurements were available to clinicians online within a median of 2
days from
the time of imaging. All clinicians and 88% of
data managers felt there was greater accuracy using this system.
Conclusion Existing
data management systems can be harnessed to enable real-time collection
and review of clinical information during
trials. This approach facilitates reporting of
information closer to the time of events, and improves efficiency, and
the
ability to make earlier clinical decisions.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.