Cost-effectiveness of early palliative care intervention in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Cost-effectiveness of early palliative care intervention in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer



Abstract


Highlights

Palliative care intervention may decrease resource utilization in patients with advanced cancer
We constructed a decision model evaluating routine care versus early palliative care intervention in platinum resistant ovarian cancer
Early palliative care intervention is potentially cost effective in end of life care in women with ovarian cancer

Objective

To determine if early palliative care intervention in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer is potentially cost saving or cost-effective.

Methods

A decision model with 6 month time horizon evaluated routine care versus routine care plus early referral to a palliative medicine specialist (EPC) for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Model parameters included rates of inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, chemotherapy administration, and quality of life (QOL). From published ovarian cancer data, we assumed baseline rates over the final 6 months: hospitalization 70%, chemotherapy 60%, ED visit 30%. Published data from a randomized trial evaluating EPC in metastatic lung cancer were used to model odds ratios (OR) for potential reductions in hospitalization (OR 0.69), chemotherapy (0.77), and emergency department care (OR 0.74) and improvement in QOL (OR 1.07). The costs of hospitalization, ED visit, chemotherapy, and EPC were based on published data. Ranges were used for sensitivity analysis. Effectiveness was quantified in quality adjusted life years (QALYs); survival was assumed equivalent between strategies.

Results

EPC was associated with a cost savings of $1,285 per patient over routine care. In sensitivity analysis incorporating QOL, EPC was either dominant or cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) < $50,000/QALY, unless the cost of outpatient EPC exceeded $2,400. Assuming no clinical benefit other than QOL (no change in chemotherapy administration, hospitalizations or ED visits), EPC remained highly cost-effective with ICER $37,440/QALY.

Conclusion

Early palliative care intervention has the potential to reduce costs associated with end of life care in patients with ovarian cancer.


0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.