|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Presented
at the American College of Surgeons 97th Annual Clinical Congress,
Medical Student Program, San Francisco, CA, October 2011
Background
The
ability to measure surgical quality of care is important and can lead
to improvements in patient safety. As such, processes should be carried
out in an identical fashion for all patients, regardless of how
vulnerable or complex they are. Our objectives were to assess quality of
surgical care delivered to elderly patients and to determine the
association between patient characteristics and quality of care.
Study Design
This
is a retrospective pilot cohort study, conducted in a single
university-affiliated hospital. Using the institution's National
Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2009 to 2010),
143 consecutive patients 65 years or older, undergoing elective major
abdominal surgery, were selected. Adherence to 15 process-based quality
indicators (QIs) was measured, and a pass rate was calculated for each
individual QI. The association between patient characteristics (age,
sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, functional status, wound class) and
patient quality score was assessed using multiple linear regression.
Results
Quality
indicators with the lowest pass rates included postoperative delirium
screening (0%), level of care documentation (0.7%), cognition and
functional assessment at discharge (4.9%), oral intake documentation
(12.6%), and pressure ulcer risk assessment (35.0%). The mean patient
quality score was 46.8% ± 10.7% (range 16.7% to 75.0%). No association
was found between patient characteristics and patient quality score.
Conclusions
Quality
of care delivered to elderly patients undergoing major surgery at our
institution was generally poor and independent of patient
characteristics. Although quality appears to be uniform across different
patients, these results provide targets for quality improvement
initiatives.
Purchase $31.50
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.