abstract
BACKGROUND:
Steady progress in outcomes has been observed after standard treatment by surgery and chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer
(AOC), but little is known about outcomes after alternative neoadjuvant
chemotherapy (NAC) proposed to primary inoperable patients. We assessed
whether NAC offers comparable survival to standard treatment, whether
survival rates have progressed over time, and what the optimal extent of
surgery at late interval debulking surgery (IDS) should be.
METHODS:
This
was a retrospective data analysis of prospectively recorded patients
with poor prognosis AOC treated by platinum/taxane NAC and late IDS
(after six cycles). Independent prognostic factors for surgical
morbidity and overall survival (OS) are determined and survival outcomes
are compared to survival rates for a similar group of patients treated
with platinum protocols.
RESULTS:
A total of 118 patients
with stages IIIC-IV AOC (median age: 64 years, stage IV: 31 %) received
IDS (46 % standard surgery and 54 % radical, with 68 % obtaining
complete resection). Major morbidity was 18 %. OS was 42 months across
all patients (95 % confidence interval 35.3-49.1) and 80 months in stage
IIIC. This is higher by 15 months than after platinum-based treatment.
Higher morbidity was associated with bowel resection. Longer OS was
associated with ASA class I, stage IIIC, no bowel surgery, and no
residual disease.
CONCLUSIONS:
The neoadjuvant approach
with late IDS offers survival similar to that reported by standard
treatment, with progress in outcomes compared with rates after platinum
treatment. The goal of IDS surgery is complete resection, while sparing
surrounding organs.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.