|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Purpose. PTEN Hamartoma Tumor syndrome (PHTS) includes patients with Cowden syndrome or other syndromes with germline mutation of
the PTEN tumor suppressor gene. The risk
for breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancer and polyposis is
increased, creating clinical
overlap with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
(HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), and adenomatous polyposis syndromes (APS).
We reviewed our series of patients with PHTS to
determine how often testing criteria for these syndromes were met and
how
often other-gene testing was ordered before testing
PTEN.
Patients and Methods. Patients were prospectively recruited by relaxed International Cowden Consortium criteria or presence of known germline PTEN
mutation. Mutations were identified by mutation scanning/multiplex
ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis and confirmed
by sequencing/quantitative polymerase chain
reaction. Patients were excluded if they were adopted, were <18 years
of age,
or if they were diagnosed with Cowden syndrome
before 1998. Standard risk-assessment models were applied to determine
whether
patients met HBOC testing criteria, LS-relevant
Amsterdam II/Bethesda 2004 criteria, or had adenomatous polyps. Prior
probability
of PTEN mutation was estimated with the Cleveland Clinic PTEN risk calculator.
Results. Of 137 PTEN
mutation-positive adult probands, 59 (43.1%) met testing criteria for
HBOC or LS. Of these, 45 (32.8%) were first offered
HBOC, LS, or APS testing. Of those who underwent
APS testing, none of the six patients met criteria. Initial risk
assessment
by a genetics specialist was significantly
associated with immediate PTEN testing in patients also meeting HBOC testing criteria. Using this PTEN risk assessment tool could have spared gene testing for 22 unlikely syndromes, at a total cost of $66,080.
Conclusion. PHTS is an important differential diagnosis for patients referred for HBOC, LS, or APS. Risk assessment tools may help focus
genetic analysis and aid in the interpretation of multiplex testing.
Implications for Practice:
Whereas hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and familial adenomatous polyposis are some of the most common causes of hereditary cancer predisposition, other conditions with overlapping clinical spectra exist. Timely identification of the right syndrome is critical for patient management and testing at-risk relatives. When
multiple conditions are possible, risk assessment tools help clinicians judge which condition is mos tlikely, allowing genetic testing o proceed in a stepwise and cost-effective manner. Here we present a series of patients with germline mutations of PTEN, a gene causing predisposition to breast, uterine, colorectal, and other cancers as well as to gastrointestinal polyposis. Many patients were tested for another syndrome prior to PTEN testing. Had now-existent risk assessment tools been used, elevated PTEN mutation risk in these patients might have been recognized immediately, leading to health care savings and shortened time to diagnosis.
The article also discusses how the use of risk assessment tools will remain important as genetic testing shifts from a single gene to a multiplex approach.
Implications for Practice:
Whereas hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and familial adenomatous polyposis are some of the most common causes of hereditary cancer predisposition, other conditions with overlapping clinical spectra exist. Timely identification of the right syndrome is critical for patient management and testing at-risk relatives. When
multiple conditions are possible, risk assessment tools help clinicians judge which condition is mos tlikely, allowing genetic testing o proceed in a stepwise and cost-effective manner. Here we present a series of patients with germline mutations of PTEN, a gene causing predisposition to breast, uterine, colorectal, and other cancers as well as to gastrointestinal polyposis. Many patients were tested for another syndrome prior to PTEN testing. Had now-existent risk assessment tools been used, elevated PTEN mutation risk in these patients might have been recognized immediately, leading to health care savings and shortened time to diagnosis.
The article also discusses how the use of risk assessment tools will remain important as genetic testing shifts from a single gene to a multiplex approach.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.