Controversies in Clinical Care: Questioning Research (Markman) 3 cancers as examples Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Thursday, April 16, 2015

Controversies in Clinical Care: Questioning Research (Markman) 3 cancers as examples



Questioning Research

 Although publication of clinical trial findings in a peer-reviewed journal is a vital step in disseminating emerging research developments, there is a critical need for all readers of oncology literature to approach these reports with a healthy degree of skepticism. Among the important questions that readers should ask are whether the conclusions are truly meaningful to patients and why the study was initiated in the first place......
Although publication of clinical trial findings in a peer-reviewed journal is a vital step in disseminating emerging research developments, there is a critical need for all readers of oncology literature to approach these reports with a healthy degree of skepticism. Among the important questions that readers should ask are whether the conclusions are truly meaningful to patients and why the study was initiated in the first place.

This commentary offers examples of clinical trials where the interpretation of study results is worthy of considerable additional discussion or where justification for the actual conduct of the study can be called into question. In fact, it is not hard to find studies in the peer-reviewed oncology literature where an objective observer could lodge a serious challenge against the conclusions reached by the study investigators. - See more at: http://www.onclive.com/publications/Oncology-live/2015/march-2015/Controversies-in-Clinical-Care-Questioning-Research#sthash.d2himgx1.dpuf
Although publication of clinical trial findings in a peer-reviewed journal is a vital step in disseminating emerging research developments, there is a critical need for all readers of oncology literature to approach these reports with a healthy degree of skepticism. Among the important questions that readers should ask are whether the conclusions are truly meaningful to patients and why the study was initiated in the first place.

This commentary offers examples of clinical trials where the interpretation of study results is worthy of considerable additional discussion or where justification for the actual conduct of the study can be called into question. In fact, it is not hard to find studies in the peer-reviewed oncology literature where an objective observer could lodge a serious challenge against the conclusions reached by the study investigators. - See more at: http://www.onclive.com/publications/Oncology-live/2015/march-2015/Controversies-in-Clinical-Care-Questioning-Research#sthash.d2himgx1.dpuf

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.