abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS:
Multigene
panels are commercially available tools for hereditary cancer risk
assessment that allow for next-generation sequencing of numerous genes
in parallel. However, it is not clear if these panels offer advantages
over traditional genetic testing. We investigated the number of cancer
predisposition gene mutations identified by parallel sequencing in
individuals with suspected Lynch syndrome.
METHODS:
We
performed germline analysis with a 25-gene next-generation sequencing
panel using DNA from 1260 individuals who underwent clinical genetic
testing for Lynch syndrome from 2012 through 2013.
All subjects had a
history of Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or polyps. We classified
all identified germline alterations for pathogenicity and calculated
the frequencies of pathogenic mutations and
variants of uncertain
significance (VUS). We also analyzed data on patients' personal and
family history of cancer, including fulfillment of clinical guidelines
for genetic testing.
RESULTS:
Of
the 1260 subjects, 1112 met National Comprehensive Cancer Network
(NCCN) criteria for Lynch syndrome testing (88%; 95% confidence interval
[CI], 86%-90%). Multigene panel testing identified 114 probands with
Lynch syndrome mutations (9.0%; 95% CI, 7.6%-10.8%) and
71 with
mutations in other cancer predisposition genes (5.6%; 95% CI,
4.4%-7.1%). Fifteen individuals had mutations in
BRCA1 or BRCA2; 93% of
these met the NCCN criteria for Lynch syndrome testing and 33% met NCCN
criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analysis (P=.0017). An additional 9
individuals carried mutations in other genes linked to high lifetime
risks of cancer (5 had mutations in APC, 3 had bi-allelic mutations in
MUTYH, and 1 had a mutation in STK11); all of these patients met NCCN
criteria for Lynch syndrome testing.
Four hundred seventy-nine
individuals had ≥1 VUS (38%; 95% CI, 35%-41%).
CONCLUSIONS:
In
individuals with suspected Lynch syndrome, multigene panel testing
identified high-penetrance mutations in cancer predisposition genes,
many of which were unexpected based on patients' histories. Parallel
sequencing also detected a high number of potentially uninformative
germline findings, including VUS.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.