|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full text
The effect of pre-diagnostic vitamin D supplementation on cancer survival in women: a cohort study within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study cohort. We identified 11,112 breast, 4122 colorectal, 3352 lung and 2979 gynaecological (ovarian and uterine) cancer cases.
Background
There remains uncertainty in whether vitamin D status affects cancer survival. We
investigated whether vitamin D (± calcium) supplementation affects cancer survival
in women.
Methods
Participants were women aged ≥55 years identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research
Datalink (CPRD) with a first diagnosis of breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian or uterine
cancer between 2002 and 2009, and at least 5 years of CPRD data prior to diagnosis.
Cox proportional hazards were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence
intervals (CI) of the relationship between pre-diagnostic vitamin D supplementation
and all-cause mortality. To avoid confounding by indication, the primary analysis
compared women with 3+ to 1–2 (but no more) vitamin D prescriptions. Models were adjusted
for pre-diagnostic body mass index, smoking, alcohol and deprivation. A sensitivity
analysis excluded supplements prescribed in the year prior to diagnosis.
Results
Exposure to 3 or more versus 1 to 2 prescriptions of vitamin D was not associated
with survival from any of the cancers studied. Any vitamin D prescription, compared
to never having been prescribed one, was associated with a better survival from breast
cancer (HR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.70 to 0.88). The sensitivity analysis suggested a possible
detrimental effect of vitamin D supplementation on lung cancer outcomes (HR for 3
versus 1 or 2 prescriptions 1.22 (95 % CI 0.94 to 1.57); HR for any versus no prescriptions
1.09 (0.98 to 1.22)).
Conclusions
We found no evidence that vitamin D supplementation is associated with survival among
women with cancer. Previous observational findings of beneficial effects of vitamin
D supplementation on cancer survival may be confounded.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.