A comparison of the toxicity and tolerability of two IP chemotherapy regimens for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer

 Blogger's Note: abstract does not detail followup period eg. PFS

Abstract
 

OBJECTIVES:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients have demonstrated an impressive survival benefit of intraperitoneal (IP) platinum over intravenous (IV), but its use has been limited by significant toxicity from cisplatin. The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and tolerability of IP cisplatin to IP carboplatin in women with optimally cytoreduced EOC.

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of 141 women with EOC who underwent optimal surgical cytoreduction followed by IV paclitaxel and IP cisplatin or IP carboplatin was performed. Toxicities of the two treatment regimens were compared. As a secondary outcome, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) probabilities were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier estimate; the log-rank test was used to compare survival curves.

RESULTS:

Of the 141 patients, 77 (54.6%) received IP cisplatin and 64 (45.4%) received IP carboplatin. Eighty-six percent received at least 4cycles of IP chemotherapy. IP cisplatin was associated with significantly more grade 3 nausea and vomiting (10.4% vs 1.6%, p=0.033), grade 3 neuropathy (7.8% vs 0%, p=0.013) and grade 2-3 neutropenia (22.1% vs 9.4%, p=0.042). No difference in PFS (p=0.602) or OS (p=0.107) was found between the groups.

CONCLUSION:

IP chemotherapy had a high completion rate in both groups of patients. IP carboplatin required a less resource intense protocol and was tolerated better than IP cisplatin with less gastrointestinal, neurologic and hematologic toxicities.