abstract
AIMS:
The
aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological features of
ovarian clear cell carcinomas in order to identify which, if any, are
prognostically significant, and to determine whether there is value in
grading these tumours.
METHODS AND RESULTS:
One
hundred tumours with clinical follow-up were reviewed. Features
evaluated included age, preoperative/intraoperative rupture, size,
architectural pattern(s), presence of oxyphilic cells, degree of
cytological atypia, nucleolar grade, mitoses, background precursor and
stage. Survival differences were analysed using the log-rank test and
Kaplan-Meier estimator. Stage and lymph node status were the only
parameters that were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Patients
with stage I disease (71%) had a 92% 5-year survival compared to a 31%
5-year survival in advanced stage disease (29%). Those with negative
lymph nodes (92%) had an 80% 5-year survival compared to a 22% 5-year
survival for those with positive nodes (8%).
CONCLUSIONS:
This
study shows that stage and lymph node status are the only
prognostically significant parameters in patients with ovarian clear
cell carcinoma. It also confirms that most patients with clear cell
carcinoma present with disease confined to the ovary, and have an
excellent prognosis. Grading ovarian clear cell carcinomas based on
morphological features is not recommended, as none are of prognostic
significance.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.