Routine Clinical Practice for Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma: Results From the TROCADERO Study Ovarian Cancer and Us OVARIAN CANCER and US Ovarian Cancer and Us

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Sunday, January 17, 2016

Routine Clinical Practice for Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma: Results From the TROCADERO Study



open access (pdf)

Abstract

Objective: Treatment options for patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma are diverse, and different therapies are recommended based on platinum-free interval (PFI). Data examining the association between platinum sensitivity, treatment strategy, and outcomes are limited, particularly for partially platinum-sensitive (PPS) patients. This study characterized clinical features and outcomes in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma in the context of sensitivity to platinum-based therapy.
Methods: Anonymized case records were obtained from eligible European medical sites. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had received 1 or more platinum-based therapies and had 1 or more subsequent relapses. Patient records were categorized by PFI and analyzed based on demographic and clinical data using descriptive statistics.
Results: There was no difference between PFI in PPS patients receiving platinum versus nonplatinum therapy (8.9 [range, 6.0-12.0] and 8.3 [range, 6.0-11.3] months, respectively). Overall survival in patients with platinum-sensitive, PPS, platinum-resistant, and platinum-refractory disease was 43.0 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 25.1-42.3), 20.5 (95% CI, 17.7-24.8), 12.7 (95% CI, 10.4-14.2), and 9.8 (95% CI, 6.6-14.9) months, respectively. Among PPS patients, overall survival was 23.5 (95% CI, 18.4-37.3) and 18.7 (95% CI, 11.0-23.5) months for those who received platinum and nonplatinum-based therapy, respectively. No demographic or clinical characteristics were identified that indicated a difference between PPS patients who received platinum-based therapy versus those who did not.
Conclusions: Partially platinum-sensitive patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma who received platinum-based therapy had improved outcomes compared with those who did not. No clear demographic criteria for choosing platinum- versus nonplatinum-based therapy for PPS patients were identified from patient records.

(pdf) .....Several clinical guidelines recommend the use of
platinum-based therapy for PPS patients. However, in the literature,
evidence supporting this treatment choice in PPS patients
specifically is limited. To date, no randomized study has
addressed this specific issue
. The TROCADERO study shows
that PPS patients experience better outcomes when they receive
platinum-based therapy; these data lend support to administration
of platinum-based treatment to PPS patients. This study
also revealed that, following first-line therapy, a group of PPS
patients with recurrent disease received non-platinum-based
treatment. This is contrary to several clinical guidelines that
recommend a platinum-based treatment for this patient group.

No criteria were identified that appeared to influence physicians’
selection of a platinum/nonplatinum treatment regimen
in this setting.
Further studies will be needed to elucidate criteria
that can be used to guide treatment decisions for patients
with recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Your comments?

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.