|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abstract
Purpose This trial
evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy
of selinexor (KPT-330), a novel, oral small-molecule
inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1/CRM1), and
determined the recommended phase II dose.
Patients and Methods In total, 189 patients with advanced solid tumors received selinexor (3 to 85 mg/m2)
in 21- or 28-day cycles. Pre- and post-treatment levels of XPO1 mRNA in
patient-derived leukocytes were determined by reverse
transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain
reaction, and tumor biopsies were examined by immunohistochemistry for
changes
in markers consistent with XPO1 inhibition.
Antitumor response was assessed according Response Evaluation Criteria
in Solid
Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 guidelines.
Results The most
common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue (70%), nausea
(70%), anorexia (66%), and vomiting (49%),
which were generally grade 1 or 2. Most commonly
reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (16%), fatigue
(15%),
and hyponatremia (13%). Clinically significant
major organ or cumulative toxicities were rare. The maximum-tolerated
dose
was defined at 65 mg/m2 using a twice-a-week (days 1 and 3) dosing schedule. The recommended phase II dose of 35 mg/m2
given twice a week was chosen based on better patient tolerability and
no demonstrable improvement in radiologic response
or disease stabilization compared with higher
doses. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional, with no evidence of drug
accumulation.
Dose-dependent elevations in XPO1 mRNA in
leukocytes were demonstrated up to a dose level of 28 mg/m2
before plateauing, and paired tumor biopsies showed nuclear accumulation
of key tumor-suppressor proteins, reduction of cell
proliferation, and induction of apoptosis. Among
157 patients evaluable for response, one complete and six partial
responses
were observed (n = 7, 4%), with 27 patients
(17%) achieving stable disease for ≥ 4 months.
Conclusion Selinexor is a novel and safe therapeutic with broad antitumor activity. Further interrogation into this class of therapy
is warranted.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.