|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
media including public comments
Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay $72M to family in cancer-talcum powder case
WHO says 'limited evidence' in humans
Spokeswoman Carol Goodrich said Tuesday that the New Jersey-based company was considering its next legal move.
In a written statement, she said the decision "goes against decades of sound science proving the safety of talc as a cosmetic ingredient in multiple products," citing supportive research by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and National Cancer Institute.....
Talcum powder-cancer link questioned
Nora Freeman Engstrom, a Stanford University law professor not involved in the Missouri case, said it's unlikely the $72-million award will survive, noting that the U.S. Supreme Court, in a recent series of rulings, has maintained that appellate courts clamp down on punitive damages....
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.