|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blogger's Note: not specific to Lynch Syndrome but of interest
BJU international.
- Author(s):
- British Association of Urological Surgeons
- International Society of Urology
- European Society of Paediatric Urology
- Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand
- Urological Society of India
Abstract
Objective
To
evaluate the prognostic impact of tumor size on survival outcomes in
upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical
nephroureterectomy (RNU).
Patients and Methods
Data
on 795 patients treated with RNU for UTUC from 7 centers were
retrospectively analyzed with focus on tumor size. Clinicopathological
features and relevent prognostic factors were compared between patients
with tumor size ≤3.0cm and >3.0cm. The primary end points were cancer
specific survival (CSS), disease recurrence-free survival (DFS), and
overall survival (OS).
Results
At
a median follow-up of 32 months, 313 (39.4%) patients died of UTUC, 321
(40.4%) developed cancer relapse, and 359 (45.1%) died of all causes.
Tumor size >3.0cm was associated with unfavorablly clinicopathlogical
features. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, tumor size was significantly
correlated with worse CSS, DFS and OS(all p <0.001). Multivariate
analysis demonstrated that tumor size was an independent predictor of
CSS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.296, p <0.001), DFS (HR: 2.193, p <
0.001), and OS (HR: 2.417, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Tumor
size >3.0cm was a significant predictor of CSS, DFS, and OS for UTUC
patients following RNU. Further studies are warranted before tumor size
is included in risk prediction tools.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.